From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73784C54EBD for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=fLCZnUegXcmhT7ecvTANQh/bbGinqHagGH0CIp6pgaw=; b=tmQxfuiymVwLyu UvTb1D5nNrfrIkW+ejdOpsz2OPgQBfZoCHUKc88UK13xPGqxEJXy7JKyivKqDpsKPuTdCjodwDUDx G7+HHLeoCiHfZV4D20yOYsfZbw/vK7V5pGyvCOnXhHP8GB23j9fNgsSVT9Wfp5lGqoXfXP7M51QWa O0/Yaltui293n7fWggxjTaw254sd9LdIfTMkAaKlkgiAi0usgoGXGt8dHq7MH3XqbAOtwE4aJYt2E z4aCsePztQbAkNWlDeSVRPjYTppv7V5b3rOrm+by3tyCRT/52MQwfyXWk0JTCQ949dk1aXTcf9Wgd oGj+pt5rP3H+nEjKUeYA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pGIxQ-002VRZ-K3; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:52 +0000 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org ([145.40.68.75]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pGIxN-002VQS-HH for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:51 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E122B82135; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3D1FC433EF; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673612085; bh=YAoO+Byw1unrROhiBcYVj0kEzsOoVTbw5Y49ArPv5bY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PHuymldC+LboDEJcHh9DFgK4OZkao77NPNEzZ01qnNHdotw94NaiSXQI1JAsO7UBw rG1OW8Hv82z2CmcWNNRn5rWfGRv/t1uPn4tstpTFE+5ZR81Xk6byqmUn9hLlv5oJWD aEi10g+PQnGB9XnK0ilY+E6Xh9/8A7sKYLnYDFAWrUT4KrHEEhMRHe3FoeBEVx/WqQ sCRsG0Wi2wM1GkcCmdbnd6TYi6O/F2N+mndqz3UUocjKbS/IVUSEQ65/gyZPV+pVXc I84rac7nGzKYoXkGvAbpZUmf0qRw8V9Yhyi+yl3UiRuEtX+y/0MyM+uZEEsTUjvlZY obnVjEQdIkcaw== From: Kalle Valo To: Wen Gong Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] wifi: ath11k: reduce the timeout value back for hw scan from 10 seconds to 1 second References: <20221011072408.23731-1-quic_wgong@quicinc.com> <20221011072408.23731-3-quic_wgong@quicinc.com> <8735atg335.fsf@kernel.org> <7bcd1a12-fb60-98cd-1a29-f55efa8d1499@quicinc.com> <73908049-4a69-e65c-665b-97d068f1fef7@quicinc.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:14:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <73908049-4a69-e65c-665b-97d068f1fef7@quicinc.com> (Wen Gong's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:54:50 +0800") Message-ID: <87k01qd426.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230113_041449_756781_2F4083CA X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 9.88 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: ath11k@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+ath11k=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Wen Gong writes: > Should I change commit log with below explanation and send v4? Please stop spamming the same question over and over, it's really annoying. If I don't have time to look at something, spamming me won't help, quite the opposite. It would be a lot better if you would help with the other upstream related tasks we have, that way I might have more time to look at your patches. To answer your question I need to look at this patchset in detail and I don't know when I'm able to do that. But at this moment I don't trust this patchset is the right approach and I'm not willing to take it. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches -- ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF87BC54EBE for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241283AbjAMMVc (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 07:21:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55494 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240584AbjAMMVJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 07:21:09 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9244180609 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 04:14:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F50B82137 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3D1FC433EF; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 12:14:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1673612085; bh=YAoO+Byw1unrROhiBcYVj0kEzsOoVTbw5Y49ArPv5bY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PHuymldC+LboDEJcHh9DFgK4OZkao77NPNEzZ01qnNHdotw94NaiSXQI1JAsO7UBw rG1OW8Hv82z2CmcWNNRn5rWfGRv/t1uPn4tstpTFE+5ZR81Xk6byqmUn9hLlv5oJWD aEi10g+PQnGB9XnK0ilY+E6Xh9/8A7sKYLnYDFAWrUT4KrHEEhMRHe3FoeBEVx/WqQ sCRsG0Wi2wM1GkcCmdbnd6TYi6O/F2N+mndqz3UUocjKbS/IVUSEQ65/gyZPV+pVXc I84rac7nGzKYoXkGvAbpZUmf0qRw8V9Yhyi+yl3UiRuEtX+y/0MyM+uZEEsTUjvlZY obnVjEQdIkcaw== From: Kalle Valo To: Wen Gong Cc: , Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] wifi: ath11k: reduce the timeout value back for hw scan from 10 seconds to 1 second References: <20221011072408.23731-1-quic_wgong@quicinc.com> <20221011072408.23731-3-quic_wgong@quicinc.com> <8735atg335.fsf@kernel.org> <7bcd1a12-fb60-98cd-1a29-f55efa8d1499@quicinc.com> <73908049-4a69-e65c-665b-97d068f1fef7@quicinc.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:14:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <73908049-4a69-e65c-665b-97d068f1fef7@quicinc.com> (Wen Gong's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:54:50 +0800") Message-ID: <87k01qd426.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Wen Gong writes: > Should I change commit log with below explanation and send v4? Please stop spamming the same question over and over, it's really annoying. If I don't have time to look at something, spamming me won't help, quite the opposite. It would be a lot better if you would help with the other upstream related tasks we have, that way I might have more time to look at your patches. To answer your question I need to look at this patchset in detail and I don't know when I'm able to do that. But at this moment I don't trust this patchset is the right approach and I'm not willing to take it. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches