From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, decui@microsoft.com,
sthemmin@microsoft.com, Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux on Hyper-V List <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/hyperv: remove on-stack cpumask from hv_send_ipi_mask_allbutself
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2021 14:53:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0ir63au.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee9batb5.ffs@tglx>
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> Wei!
>
Not Wei here but I don't see the question answered on the mailing list
so let me give my thoughts.
> On Fri, Sep 10 2021 at 18:57, Wei Liu wrote:
>> -static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
>> +static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector,
>> + bool exclude_self)
>> {
>> struct hv_send_ipi_ex **arg;
>> struct hv_send_ipi_ex *ipi_arg;
>> @@ -123,7 +124,10 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
>>
>> if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
>
> Not part of that patch, but is checking cpu_present_mask correct here?
> If so then this really lacks a comment for the casual reader.
It seems it *was* correct prior to 'exclude_self': the idea is that for
everything but 'cpu_present_mask' we use HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARSE_4K
format, for 'cpu_present_mask' we just use 'all' (HV_GENERIC_SET_ALL)
to avoid specifying individual CPUs.
>
>> ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARSE_4K;
>> - nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask);
>> + if (exclude_self)
>> + nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset_noself(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask);
>> + else
>> + nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask);
>> }
>
> But, what happens in the case that mask == cpu_present_mask and
> exclude_self == true?
>
> AFAICT it ends up sending the IPI to all CPUs including self:
>
> if (!nr_bank)
> ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_ALL;
>
> Not entirely correct, right?
It's not, I think we need something like (completely untested)
diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
index 32a1ad356c18..80b7660208e4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_apic.c
@@ -122,17 +122,17 @@ static bool __send_ipi_mask_ex(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector,
ipi_arg->reserved = 0;
ipi_arg->vp_set.valid_bank_mask = 0;
- if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cpu_present_mask)) {
+ if (!cpumask_equal(mask, cpu_present_mask) || exclude_self) {
ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_SPARSE_4K;
if (exclude_self)
nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset_noself(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask);
else
nr_bank = cpumask_to_vpset(&(ipi_arg->vp_set), mask);
- }
- if (nr_bank < 0)
- goto ipi_mask_ex_done;
- if (!nr_bank)
+ if (nr_bank =< 0)
+ goto ipi_mask_ex_done;
+ } else {
ipi_arg->vp_set.format = HV_GENERIC_SET_ALL;
+ }
status = hv_do_rep_hypercall(HVCALL_SEND_IPI_EX, 0, nr_bank,
ipi_arg, NULL);
here. Wei, I can test and send this out if you're not on it already.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-05 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 18:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove on-stack cpumask in hv_apic.c Wei Liu
2021-09-10 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] asm-generic/hyperv: provide cpumask_to_vpset_noself Wei Liu
2021-09-11 15:06 ` Michael Kelley
2021-09-10 18:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/hyperv: remove on-stack cpumask from hv_send_ipi_mask_allbutself Wei Liu
2021-09-11 15:09 ` Michael Kelley
2021-09-11 15:24 ` Wei Liu
2021-09-26 22:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-05 12:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-10-06 11:39 ` Wei Liu
2021-09-13 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Remove on-stack cpumask in hv_apic.c Wei Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0ir63au.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.