From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: mst@redhat.com, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH] content: Remove duplicate paragraph
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 12:56:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0it2h3j.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210930125847.28823-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org>
On Thu, Sep 30 2021, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> wrote:
> It looks like commit 356aeeb40d7a ("content: add vendor specific cfg
> type") had a merge issue. It includes the device normative paragraph for
> Shared memory capability, which was already added right above it by
> commit 855ad7af2bd6 ("shared memory: Define PCI capability"). Remove the
> duplicate paragraph.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
> ---
> This applies onto "Fix copy/paste bug in PCI transport paragraph", that
> fixes both paragraph titles.
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202108/msg00097.html
> ---
> content.tex | 8 --------
> 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index 4418ac8..54f7441 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -1149,14 +1149,6 @@ \subsubsection{Shared memory capability}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Vi
>
> The \field{cap.id} MUST be unique for any one device instance.
>
> -\devicenormative{\paragraph}{Shared memory capability}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Shared memory capability}
> -
> -The region defined by the combination of the \field {cap.offset},
> -\field {cap.offset_hi}, and \field {cap.length}, \field
> -{cap.length_hi} fields MUST be contained within the declared bar.
> -
> -The \field{cap.id} MUST be unique for any one device instance.
> -
> \subsubsection{Vendor data capability}\label{sec:Virtio
> Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout /
> Vendor data capability}
Hm. This statement is indeed included twice, but the two are not exactly
the same. For the first paragraph, do we want to use a combination of
the two? IOW, something like
"The region defined by the combination of the \field {cap.offset},
\field {cap.offset_hi}, and \field {cap.length}, \field
{cap.length_hi} fields MUST be contained within the BAR specified by
\field{cap.bar}."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-04 10:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-30 12:58 [PATCH] content: Remove duplicate paragraph Jean-Philippe Brucker
2021-10-04 9:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-10-04 9:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-10-04 10:56 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-10-06 11:24 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0it2h3j.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.