From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 02:13:53 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0sv6hv2.fsf@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201231162845.1853347-1-mfo@canonical.com> (Mauricio Faria de Oliveira's message of "Thu, 31 Dec 2020 13:28:45 -0300")
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com> writes:
> There's an I/O error on fsync() in a detached loop device
> if it has been previously attached.
>
> The issue is write cache is enabled in the attach path in
> loop_configure() but it isn't disabled in the detach path;
> thus it remains enabled in the block device regardless of
> whether it is attached or not.
>
> Now fsync() can get an I/O request that will just be failed
> later in loop_queue_rq() as device's state is not 'Lo_bound'.
>
> So, disable write cache in the detach path.
>
> Test-case:
>
> # DEV=/dev/loop7
>
> # IMG=/tmp/image
> # truncate --size 1M $IMG
>
> # losetup $DEV $IMG
> # losetup -d $DEV
>
> Before:
>
> # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
> fsync(3) = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
> Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/loop7: Input/output error
> [ 982.529929] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop7, sector 0 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 0 prio class 0
>
> After:
>
> # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
> fsync(3) = 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
> Co-developed-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
This sign-off chain is not sorted correctly. See Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
Other than that, I think the fix makes sense.
Tested-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/block/loop.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index e5ff328f0917..49517482e061 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -1212,6 +1212,9 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> + if (!(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_READ_ONLY) && filp->f_op->fsync)
> + blk_queue_write_cache(lo->lo_queue, false, false);
> +
> /* freeze request queue during the transition */
> blk_mq_freeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-02 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-31 16:28 [PATCH] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-02 5:13 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2021-01-05 13:57 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0sv6hv2.fsf@collabora.com \
--to=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfo@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.