From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@fb.com,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com,
kernel-team@fb.com, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 16:29:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0ymwg2b.fsf@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200729040913.2815687-2-andriin@fb.com>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:09 AM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Add test validating that all inner maps are released properly after skeleton
> is destroyed. To ensure determinism, trigger kernel-side synchronize_rcu()
> before checking map existence by their IDs.
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> index f7ee8fa377ad..f6eee3fb933c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_map_in_map.c
> @@ -5,10 +5,60 @@
>
> #include "test_btf_map_in_map.skel.h"
>
> +static int duration;
> +
> +static __u32 bpf_map_id(struct bpf_map *map)
> +{
> + struct bpf_map_info info;
> + __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> + int err;
> +
> + memset(&info, 0, info_len);
> + err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_map__fd(map), &info, &info_len);
> + if (err)
> + return 0;
> + return info.id;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Trigger synchronize_cpu() in kernel.
Nit: synchronize_*r*cu().
> + *
> + * ARRAY_OF_MAPS/HASH_OF_MAPS lookup/update operations trigger
> + * synchronize_rcu(), if looking up/updating non-NULL element. Use this fact
> + * to trigger synchronize_cpu(): create map-in-map, create a trivial ARRAY
> + * map, update map-in-map with ARRAY inner map. Then cleanup. At the end, at
> + * least one synchronize_rcu() would be called.
> + */
That's a cool trick. I'm a bit confused by "looking up/updating non-NULL
element". It looks like you're updating an element that is NULL/unset in
the code below. What am I missing?
> +static int kern_sync_rcu(void)
> +{
> + int inner_map_fd, outer_map_fd, err, zero = 0;
> +
> + inner_map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, 4, 4, 1, 0);
> + if (CHECK(inner_map_fd < 0, "inner_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno))
> + return -1;
> +
> + outer_map_fd = bpf_create_map_in_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY_OF_MAPS, NULL,
> + sizeof(int), inner_map_fd, 1, 0);
> + if (CHECK(outer_map_fd < 0, "outer_map_create", "failed %d\n", -errno)) {
> + close(inner_map_fd);
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_map_fd, &zero, &inner_map_fd, 0);
> + if (err)
> + err = -errno;
> + CHECK(err, "outer_map_update", "failed %d\n", err);
> + close(inner_map_fd);
> + close(outer_map_fd);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
> {
> - int duration = 0, err, key = 0, val;
> - struct test_btf_map_in_map* skel;
> + int err, key = 0, val, i;
> + struct test_btf_map_in_map *skel;
> + int outer_arr_fd, outer_hash_fd;
> + int fd, map1_fd, map2_fd, map1_id, map2_id;
>
> skel = test_btf_map_in_map__open_and_load();
> if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open&load skeleton\n"))
> @@ -18,32 +68,78 @@ void test_btf_map_in_map(void)
> if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
> goto cleanup;
>
> + map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> + map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> + outer_arr_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr);
> + outer_hash_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash);
> +
> /* inner1 = input, inner2 = input + 1 */
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
> + map1_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
> + map2_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
> skel->bss->input = 1;
> usleep(1);
>
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 1, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 1);
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 2, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 2);
>
> /* inner1 = input + 1, inner2 = input */
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_arr), &key, &val, 0);
> - val = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> - bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.outer_hash), &key, &val, 0);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &map2_fd, 0);
> + bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &map1_fd, 0);
> skel->bss->input = 3;
> usleep(1);
>
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map1), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map1_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 4, "inner1", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 4);
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.inner_map2), &key, &val);
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map2_fd, &key, &val);
> CHECK(val != 3, "inner2", "got %d != exp %d\n", val, 3);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
> + val = i % 2 ? map1_fd : map2_fd;
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_hash_fd, &key, &val, 0);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
> + printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + err = bpf_map_update_elem(outer_arr_fd, &key, &val, 0);
> + if (CHECK_FAIL(err)) {
> + printf("failed to update hash_of_maps on iter #%d\n", i);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + map1_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map1);
> + map2_id = bpf_map_id(skel->maps.inner_map2);
> + CHECK(map1_id == 0, "map1_id", "failed to get ID 1\n");
> + CHECK(map2_id == 0, "map2_id", "failed to get ID 2\n");
> +
> + test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
> + skel = NULL;
> +
> + /* we need to either wait for or force synchronize_rcu(), before
> + * checking for "still exists" condition, otherwise map could still be
> + * resolvable by ID, causing false positives.
> + *
> + * Older kernels (5.8 and earlier) freed map only after two
> + * synchronize_rcu()s, so trigger two, to be entirely sure.
> + */
> + CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
> + CHECK(kern_sync_rcu(), "sync_rcu", "failed\n");
> +
> + fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map1_id);
> + if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map1_leak", "inner_map1 leaked!\n")) {
> + close(fd);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> + fd = bpf_map_get_fd_by_id(map2_id);
> + if (CHECK(fd >= 0, "map2_leak", "inner_map2 leaked!\n")) {
> + close(fd);
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
> +
> cleanup:
> test_btf_map_in_map__destroy(skel);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-29 4:09 [PATCH v4 bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-29 4:09 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: extend map-in-map selftest to detect memory leaks Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-29 14:29 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2020-07-29 17:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-29 20:29 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-29 21:17 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-29 23:44 ` [PATCH v4 bpf 1/2] bpf: fix map leak in HASH_OF_MAPS map Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0ymwg2b.fsf@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andriin@fb.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.