* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
@ 2020-02-17 18:42 Jani Nikula
2020-02-17 18:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-02-17 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Jani Nikula
spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct
spinlock.
Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
index b9a1d54a4643..28760bd03265 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ struct i915_gem_context {
char name[TASK_COMM_LEN + 8];
struct {
- struct spinlock lock;
+ spinlock_t lock;
struct list_head engines;
} stale;
};
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
2020-02-17 18:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Jani Nikula
@ 2020-02-17 18:55 ` Patchwork
2020-02-17 20:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-17 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73546/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
7042c07be74c drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
-:23: CHECK:UNCOMMENTED_DEFINITION: spinlock_t definition without comment
#23: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context_types.h:184:
+ spinlock_t lock;
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 8 lines checked
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
2020-02-17 18:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Jani Nikula
2020-02-17 18:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
@ 2020-02-17 20:16 ` Patchwork
2020-02-17 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-02-19 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-17 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73546/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7957 -> Patchwork_16595
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16595 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt:
- fi-kbl-7500u: [TIMEOUT][1] ([fdo#112271]) -> [PASS][2]
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/fi-kbl-7500u/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
- fi-icl-u3: [TIMEOUT][3] ([fdo#112271]) -> [PASS][4]
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/fi-icl-u3/igt@i915_selftest@live_gtt.html
[fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
Participating hosts (46 -> 44)
------------------------------
Additional (5): fi-skl-6770hq fi-bdw-gvtdvm fi-cfl-8109u fi-skl-lmem fi-skl-6600u
Missing (7): fi-hsw-4200u fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bsw-nick fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7957 -> Patchwork_16595
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7957: 3ceb00d5a5d62566c5979edcbf06df2c15b62b80 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5445: 21e523814d692978d6d04ba85eadd67fcbd88b7e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_16595: 7042c07be74c22b04bbf232e1ae8c4fe4693456b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
7042c07be74c drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
2020-02-17 18:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Jani Nikula
2020-02-17 18:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-02-17 20:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
@ 2020-02-17 20:26 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-18 7:46 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-19 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2020-02-17 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx; +Cc: Jani Nikula
Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19)
> spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct
> spinlock.
>
> Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines")
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
If you say so,
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
If you look you might find a few more I've added ;)
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
2020-02-17 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
@ 2020-02-18 7:46 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-19 13:14 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-02-18 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19)
>> spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct
>> spinlock.
>>
>> Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines")
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>
> If you say so,
Checkpatch and a git grep popularity contest in the kernel tree say
so...
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Thanks!
> If you look you might find a few more I've added ;)
Oh? My git grep fails me then.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
2020-02-18 7:46 ` Jani Nikula
@ 2020-02-19 13:14 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2020-02-19 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>> Quoting Jani Nikula (2020-02-17 18:42:19)
>>> spinlock_t is one case where the typedef is to be preferred over struct
>>> spinlock.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 42fb60de3129 ("drm/i915/gem: Don't leak non-persistent requests on changing engines")
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>
>> If you say so,
>
> Checkpatch and a git grep popularity contest in the kernel tree say
> so...
>
>> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> Thanks!
And pushed.
BR,
Jani.
>
>> If you look you might find a few more I've added ;)
>
> Oh? My git grep fails me then.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
2020-02-17 18:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Jani Nikula
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-02-17 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
@ 2020-02-19 12:02 ` Patchwork
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2020-02-19 12:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/73546/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7957_full -> Patchwork_16595_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_16595_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@gem_caching@read-writes:
- shard-hsw: [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2] ([i915#694])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_caching@read-writes.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-hsw6/igt@gem_caching@read-writes.html
* igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][3] -> [SKIP][4] ([fdo#110841])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][5] -> [TIMEOUT][6] ([fdo#112271])
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
- shard-tglb: [PASS][7] -> [TIMEOUT][8] ([fdo#112271])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_balancer@hang.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@independent-bsd2:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][9] -> [SKIP][10] ([fdo#109276]) +17 similar issues
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@independent-bsd2.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@independent-bsd2.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][11] -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#677])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common-bsd.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@pi-common-bsd.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][13] -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#112146]) +6 similar issues
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preemptive-hang-bsd.html
* igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled:
- shard-apl: [PASS][15] -> [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled.html
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions:
- shard-skl: [PASS][17] -> [FAIL][18] ([IGT#5])
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible:
- shard-skl: [PASS][19] -> [FAIL][20] ([i915#79])
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible.html
* igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes:
- shard-skl: [PASS][21] -> [INCOMPLETE][22] ([i915#69]) +1 similar issue
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl6/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes.html
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-c-planes.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min:
- shard-skl: [PASS][23] -> [FAIL][24] ([fdo#108145]) +2 similar issues
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min.html
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-min.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][25] -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#109441]) +1 similar issue
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic:
- shard-apl: [PASS][27] -> [FAIL][28] ([i915#31])
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-apl4/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-apl2/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
* igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][29] -> [DMESG-WARN][30] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][31] -> [SKIP][32] ([fdo#112080]) +4 similar issues
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb1/igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs1.html
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb6/igt@perf_pmu@busy-no-semaphores-vcs1.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* {igt@gem_ctx_persistence@close-replace-race}:
- shard-iclb: [FAIL][33] ([i915#1241]) -> [PASS][34]
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@close-replace-race.html
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@close-replace-race.html
- shard-apl: [FAIL][35] ([i915#1241]) -> [PASS][36]
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@close-replace-race.html
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@close-replace-race.html
* igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][37] ([fdo#110854]) -> [PASS][38]
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html
* igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][39] ([fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][40] +6 similar issues
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1.html
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1.html
* igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][41] ([fdo#112146]) -> [PASS][42] +2 similar issues
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html
* igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@writes-after-reads-uncached:
- shard-hsw: [FAIL][43] ([i915#694]) -> [PASS][44] +1 similar issue
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-hsw5/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@writes-after-reads-uncached.html
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-hsw2/igt@gem_partial_pwrite_pread@writes-after-reads-uncached.html
* igt@gem_vm_create@isolation:
- shard-glk: [FAIL][45] ([i915#314]) -> [PASS][46]
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-glk4/igt@gem_vm_create@isolation.html
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-glk2/igt@gem_vm_create@isolation.html
* igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost:
- shard-iclb: [FAIL][47] ([i915#413]) -> [PASS][48]
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost.html
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_rps@waitboost.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend:
- shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][49] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][50] +6 similar issues
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@long-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic:
- shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][51] ([i915#88]) -> [PASS][52]
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl6/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@long-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic.html
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@long-nonblocking-modeset-vs-cursor-atomic.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend:
- shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][53] ([i915#180] / [i915#56]) -> [PASS][54]
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible:
- shard-hsw: [INCOMPLETE][55] ([i915#61]) -> [PASS][56]
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-hsw5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-hsw2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-modesetfrombusy:
- shard-tglb: [SKIP][57] ([i915#668]) -> [PASS][58] +4 similar issues
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-modesetfrombusy.html
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-tglb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-modesetfrombusy.html
* igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes:
- shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][59] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][60] +3 similar issues
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-apl3/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes.html
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-apl4/igt@kms_plane@plane-panning-bottom-right-suspend-pipe-a-planes.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-min:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][61] ([fdo#108145]) -> [PASS][62]
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-min.html
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-constant-alpha-min.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][63] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [PASS][64]
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-skl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-skl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html
* igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068]) -> [PASS][66]
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html
* igt@kms_psr@no_drrs:
- shard-iclb: [FAIL][67] ([i915#173]) -> [PASS][68]
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@no_drrs.html
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_psr@no_drrs.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][69] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][70] +2 similar issues
[69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html
[70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html
* igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd2:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][71] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][72] +10 similar issues
[71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb8/igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd2.html
[72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@prime_busy@hang-bsd2.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][73] ([fdo#112080]) -> [FAIL][74] ([IGT#28])
[73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch.html
[74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv-switch.html
* igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms:
- shard-tglb: [FAIL][75] ([i915#454]) -> [SKIP][76] ([i915#468])
[75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7957/shard-tglb8/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
[76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/shard-tglb2/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-dpms.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[IGT#28]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/issues/28
[IGT#5]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools/issues/5
[fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
[fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276
[fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
[fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
[fdo#110841]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110841
[fdo#110854]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110854
[fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068
[fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080
[fdo#112146]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112146
[fdo#112271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271
[i915#1188]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1188
[i915#1241]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1241
[i915#173]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/173
[i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
[i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265
[i915#31]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/31
[i915#314]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/314
[i915#413]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/413
[i915#454]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/454
[i915#468]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/468
[i915#56]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/56
[i915#61]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/61
[i915#668]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/668
[i915#677]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/677
[i915#69]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/69
[i915#694]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/694
[i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79
[i915#88]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/88
Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------
No changes in participating hosts
Build changes
-------------
* CI: CI-20190529 -> None
* Linux: CI_DRM_7957 -> Patchwork_16595
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_7957: 3ceb00d5a5d62566c5979edcbf06df2c15b62b80 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_5445: 21e523814d692978d6d04ba85eadd67fcbd88b7e @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_16595: 7042c07be74c22b04bbf232e1ae8c4fe4693456b @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_16595/index.html
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-02-19 13:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-02-17 18:42 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gem: use spinlock_t instead of struct spinlock Jani Nikula
2020-02-17 18:55 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-02-17 20:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-17 20:26 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Chris Wilson
2020-02-18 7:46 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-19 13:14 ` Jani Nikula
2020-02-19 12:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.