From: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Allowing modules to control tracing subsystem
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 08:44:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1gdezb4.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h8bvffth.fsf@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1897 bytes --]
Hi,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've been thinking about turning my f-trace.c USB function [1] into an
> implementation of the USB Debug Class [2]. In order to support all
> requests, I would need means to control parts of the tracing subsystem,
> for example enabling and disabling tracing, flushing the trace buffer,
> changing trace buffer size, choose which trace events to enable, etc.
>
> Some of those functions (e.g. print_trace_line()) are available for
> things like trace_kdb.c [3], but they're not available for modules;
> i.e. they're not exported symbols.
>
> This will involve a rather large change to tracing subsystem however we
> could rely on such infrastructure for remote debugging of e.g. IVIs,
> phones, etc.
>
> The USB Debug Class already predicts the presence of JTAG access and
> Hardware tracing modules to be exported over USB. It also allows for
> GDB-type access. Adding our linux kernel tracing would make it into a
> complete tracing solution.
>
> In order to fully support this we would need, not only to expose some
> internal trace functions for modules, but I suppose the trace format
> would have to be slightly better defined so that it be decoded remotely
> give access to vmlinux.
>
> What do you guys think about this? Would this be something that folks
> would be interested in? Currently we can only export ftrace data, not
> trace events or anything else. Ideally we would export raw trace buffer
> entries to be decoded at a later moment.
>
> cheers
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?i=20190321094748.7031-1-felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com
> [2] https://www.usb.org/sites/default/files/documents/usb_debug_class_rev_1_0_final_0.pdf
> [3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/kernel/trace/trace_kdb.c#n20
A gentle reminder here.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 8:56 [RFC] Allowing modules to control tracing subsystem Felipe Balbi
2019-04-02 5:44 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2019-05-24 3:05 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k1gdezb4.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.