From: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: Mark up Ironlake ips with rpm wakerefs
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 17:01:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1j7z3iw.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190110101152.15651-22-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
> Currently Ironlake operates under the assumption that rpm awake (and its
> error checking is disabled). As such, we have missed a few places where we
> access registers without taking the rpm wakeref and thus trigger
> warnings. intel_ips being one culprit.
>
> As this involved adding a potentially sleeping rpm_get, we have to
> rearrange the spinlocks slightly and so switch to acquiring a device-ref
> under the spinlock rather than hold the spinlock for the whole
> operation. To be consistent, we make the change in pattern common to the
> intel_ips interface even though this adds a few more atomic operations
> than necessary in a few cases.
>
> v2: Sagar noted the mb around setting mch_dev were overkill as we only
> need ordering there, and that i915_emon_status was still using
> struct_mutex for no reason, but lacked rpm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 32 ++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 172 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 96717a23b32f..c0263c233faa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1741,32 +1741,24 @@ static int i915_sr_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>
> static int i915_emon_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
> - struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
> - unsigned long temp, chipset, gfx;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
> intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> - int ret;
>
> - if (!IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
> + if (!IS_GEN(i915, 5))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + with_intel_runtime_pm(i915, wakeref) {
> + unsigned long temp, chipset, gfx;
>
> - wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
> -
> - temp = i915_mch_val(dev_priv);
> - chipset = i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> - gfx = i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> - mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + temp = i915_mch_val(i915);
> + chipset = i915_chipset_val(i915);
> + gfx = i915_gfx_val(i915);
>
> - intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv, wakeref);
> -
> - seq_printf(m, "GMCH temp: %ld\n", temp);
> - seq_printf(m, "Chipset power: %ld\n", chipset);
> - seq_printf(m, "GFX power: %ld\n", gfx);
> - seq_printf(m, "Total power: %ld\n", chipset + gfx);
> + seq_printf(m, "GMCH temp: %ld\n", temp);
> + seq_printf(m, "Chipset power: %ld\n", chipset);
> + seq_printf(m, "GFX power: %ld\n", gfx);
> + seq_printf(m, "Total power: %ld\n", chipset + gfx);
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> index 5731f992cf44..dafbbfadd1ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> @@ -1780,6 +1780,9 @@ void i915_driver_unload(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> i915_driver_unregister(dev_priv);
>
> + /* Flush any external code that still may be under the RCU lock */
> + synchronize_rcu();
> +
> if (i915_gem_suspend(dev_priv))
> DRM_ERROR("failed to idle hardware; continuing to unload!\n");
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index ab7257720c7e..7613ae72df3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -6203,10 +6203,6 @@ void intel_init_ipc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> */
> DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mchdev_lock);
>
> -/* Global for IPS driver to get at the current i915 device. Protected by
> - * mchdev_lock. */
> -static struct drm_i915_private *i915_mch_dev;
> -
> bool ironlake_set_drps(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u8 val)
> {
> u16 rgvswctl;
> @@ -7849,16 +7845,17 @@ static unsigned long __i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> unsigned long i915_chipset_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - unsigned long val;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + unsigned long val = 0;
>
> if (!IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
> return 0;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> -
> - val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> -
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + with_intel_runtime_pm(dev_priv, wakeref) {
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
This lock is now much more ips lock than mchdev_lock.
Name should reflect that, so ips_lock?
> + val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + }
>
> return val;
> }
> @@ -7935,14 +7932,16 @@ static void __i915_update_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> void i915_update_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +
> if (!IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
> return;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> -
> - __i915_update_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> -
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + with_intel_runtime_pm(dev_priv, wakeref) {
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + __i915_update_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + }
> }
>
> static unsigned long __i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> @@ -7984,18 +7983,34 @@ static unsigned long __i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> - unsigned long val;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> + unsigned long val = 0;
>
> if (!IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5))
> return 0;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + with_intel_runtime_pm(dev_priv, wakeref) {
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + }
>
> - val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> + return val;
> +}
>
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> +static struct drm_i915_private *i915_mch_dev;
>
> - return val;
> +static struct drm_i915_private *mchdev_get(void)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + i915 = i915_mch_dev;
> + if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&i915->drm.ref))
> + i915 = NULL;
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + return i915;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -8006,23 +8021,24 @@ unsigned long i915_gfx_val(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> */
> unsigned long i915_read_mch_val(void)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
> - unsigned long chipset_val, graphics_val, ret = 0;
> -
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - if (!i915_mch_dev)
> - goto out_unlock;
> - dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
> -
> - chipset_val = __i915_chipset_val(dev_priv);
> - graphics_val = __i915_gfx_val(dev_priv);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> + unsigned long chipset_val = 0;
> + unsigned long graphics_val = 0;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>
> - ret = chipset_val + graphics_val;
> + i915 = mchdev_get();
> + if (!i915)
> + return 0;
>
> -out_unlock:
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + with_intel_runtime_pm(i915, wakeref) {
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + chipset_val = __i915_chipset_val(i915);
> + graphics_val = __i915_gfx_val(i915);
> + spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + }
>
> - return ret;
> + drm_dev_put(&i915->drm);
mchdev_put() would read better.
-Mika
> + return chipset_val + graphics_val;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_read_mch_val);
>
> @@ -8033,23 +8049,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_read_mch_val);
> */
> bool i915_gpu_raise(void)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
> - bool ret = true;
> -
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - if (!i915_mch_dev) {
> - ret = false;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> - dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
>
> - if (dev_priv->ips.max_delay > dev_priv->ips.fmax)
> - dev_priv->ips.max_delay--;
> + i915 = mchdev_get();
> + if (!i915)
> + return false;
>
> -out_unlock:
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + if (i915->ips.max_delay > i915->ips.fmax)
> + i915->ips.max_delay--;
> spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
>
> - return ret;
> + drm_dev_put(&i915->drm);
> + return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_raise);
>
> @@ -8061,23 +8073,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_raise);
> */
> bool i915_gpu_lower(void)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
> - bool ret = true;
> -
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - if (!i915_mch_dev) {
> - ret = false;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> - dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
>
> - if (dev_priv->ips.max_delay < dev_priv->ips.min_delay)
> - dev_priv->ips.max_delay++;
> + i915 = mchdev_get();
> + if (!i915)
> + return false;
>
> -out_unlock:
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + if (i915->ips.max_delay < i915->ips.min_delay)
> + i915->ips.max_delay++;
> spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
>
> - return ret;
> + drm_dev_put(&i915->drm);
> + return true;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_lower);
>
> @@ -8088,13 +8096,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_lower);
> */
> bool i915_gpu_busy(void)
> {
> - bool ret = false;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> + bool ret;
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - if (i915_mch_dev)
> - ret = i915_mch_dev->gt.awake;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + i915 = mchdev_get();
> + if (!i915)
> + return false;
>
> + ret = i915->gt.awake;
> +
> + drm_dev_put(&i915->drm);
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_busy);
> @@ -8107,24 +8118,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_busy);
> */
> bool i915_gpu_turbo_disable(void)
> {
> - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv;
> - bool ret = true;
> -
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - if (!i915_mch_dev) {
> - ret = false;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> - dev_priv = i915_mch_dev;
> -
> - dev_priv->ips.max_delay = dev_priv->ips.fstart;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> + bool ret;
>
> - if (!ironlake_set_drps(dev_priv, dev_priv->ips.fstart))
> - ret = false;
> + i915 = mchdev_get();
> + if (!i915)
> + return false;
>
> -out_unlock:
> + spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + i915->ips.max_delay = i915->ips.fstart;
> + ret = ironlake_set_drps(i915, i915->ips.fstart);
> spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
>
> + drm_dev_put(&i915->drm);
> return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(i915_gpu_turbo_disable);
> @@ -8153,18 +8159,14 @@ void intel_gpu_ips_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> {
> /* We only register the i915 ips part with intel-ips once everything is
> * set up, to avoid intel-ips sneaking in and reading bogus values. */
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - i915_mch_dev = dev_priv;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(i915_mch_dev, dev_priv);
>
> ips_ping_for_i915_load();
> }
>
> void intel_gpu_ips_teardown(void)
> {
> - spin_lock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> - i915_mch_dev = NULL;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&mchdev_lock);
> + rcu_assign_pointer(i915_mch_dev, NULL);
> }
>
> static void intel_init_emon(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> --
> 2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-14 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-10 10:11 Track rpm wakerefs to fix bugs Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 01/21] drm/i915: Track all held rpm wakerefs Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: Markup paired operations on wakerefs Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:20 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 03/21] drm/i915: Track GT wakeref Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915: Track the rpm wakerefs for error handling Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 05/21] drm/i915: Mark up sysfs with rpm wakeref tracking Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 06/21] drm/i915: Mark up debugfs " Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 07/21] drm/i915/perf: Track the rpm wakeref Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 08/21] drm/i915/pmu: Track " Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 09/21] drm/i915/guc: Track the " Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 10/21] drm/i915/gem: Track the rpm wakerefs Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 11/21] drm/i915/fb: Track " Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 12/21] drm/i915/hotplug: Track temporary rpm wakeref Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 13/21] drm/i915/panel: " Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 14/21] drm/i915/selftests: Mark up rpm wakerefs Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 15/21] drm/i915: Syntatic sugar for using intel_runtime_pm Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 16/21] drm/i915: Markup paired operations on display power domains Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 15:51 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-01-10 16:21 ` Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 16:49 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 17/21] drm/i915: Track the wakeref used to initialise " Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 23:15 ` John Harrison
2019-01-10 23:21 ` Chris Wilson
2019-01-11 13:09 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 18/21] drm/i915: Combined gt.awake/gt.power wakerefs Chris Wilson
2019-01-14 14:20 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 19/21] drm/i915/dp: Markup pps lock power well Chris Wilson
2019-01-11 0:16 ` John Harrison
2019-01-11 1:19 ` Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 20/21] drm/i915: Complain if hsw_get_pipe_config acquires the same power well twice Chris Wilson
2019-01-11 13:47 ` Mika Kuoppala
2019-01-10 10:11 ` [PATCH 21/21] drm/i915: Mark up Ironlake ips with rpm wakerefs Chris Wilson
2019-01-11 21:05 ` John Harrison
2019-01-14 15:01 ` Mika Kuoppala [this message]
2019-01-14 16:57 ` Chris Wilson
2019-01-10 11:47 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [01/21] drm/i915: Track all held " Patchwork
2019-01-10 11:54 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2019-01-10 12:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k1j7z3iw.fsf@gaia.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.