All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	cota@braap.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests: replace rem = sleep(time) with g_timer
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:25:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k1jbuhd8.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190111193254.15849683@bahia.lan>


Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> writes:

> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 16:41:41 +0100
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/19 16:28, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >> Why not g_usleep?  It already does a while loop around nanosleep (which
>> >> returns the remaining time in the wait, like select but unlike sleep and
>> >> poll).
>> > Yeah I'm testing that now. However I have managed to trigger:
>> >
>> >   ERROR:tests/test-qht-par.c:20:test_qht: assertion failed (rc == 0): (35584 == 0)
>>
>> I think that's a good old SIGSEGV (0x8B00).
>>
>
> Hmmm... system() returns a "wait status" that can  be examined using the
> macros described in waitpid(2), and we have:
>
> /* If WIFEXITED(STATUS), the low-order 8 bits of the status.  */
> #define	__WEXITSTATUS(status)	(((status) & 0xff00) >> 8)
>
> So this rather looks like a 139 exit status to me... Not sure how
> this can happen though.

Yeah the child segfaulted in mcount while closing down. I've started a
new thread with the details of the remaining failure modes:

  Subject: Remaining CI failures
  Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:10:07 +0000
  Message-ID: <87lg3rui28.fsf@linaro.org>


--
Alex Bennée

      reply	other threads:[~2019-01-11 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-11 14:38 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] tests: replace rem = sleep(time) with g_timer Alex Bennée
2019-01-11 14:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-01-11 15:28   ` Alex Bennée
2019-01-11 15:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2019-01-11 16:05       ` Alex Bennée
2019-01-11 16:06       ` Alex Bennée
2019-01-11 19:05         ` Eduardo Habkost
2019-01-11 18:32       ` Greg Kurz
2019-01-11 19:25         ` Alex Bennée [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k1jbuhd8.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=cota@braap.org \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.