From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.80.166.35 with SMTP id d32csp746821edc; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 09:54:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.55.79.86 with SMTP id d83mr8388009qkb.24.1478192071043; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org. [2001:4830:134:3::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w77si4725906qkb.46.2016.11.03.09.54.30 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:54:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org designates 2001:4830:134:3::11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2LHa-0007tF-Hc for alex.bennee@linaro.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:54:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2LHW-0007sD-IP for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:54:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2LHT-0001Ct-H8 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:54:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2LHT-0001CQ-Am; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:54:23 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35986C04B31B; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-116-30.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.30]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uA3GsKtZ031607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:54:21 -0400 Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4AE111386CE; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:54:19 +0100 (CET) From: Markus Armbruster To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= References: <20161005133530.5702-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:54:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161005133530.5702-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> ("Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZIidz?= message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:35:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87k2ckwll0.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.26 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 03 Nov 2016 16:54:22 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qom+coccinelle: add and use object_new_with_class() X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rob Herring , Eduardo Habkost , Peter Maydell , Igor Mitsyanko , Alexander Graf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Filippov , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Alistair Francis , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+alex.bennee=linaro.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-arm" X-TUID: nBNNEcPIQceo Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 writes: > This series performs a simple replacement of > object_new(object_class_get_name(class)) by object_new_with_class(class) > in the spirit of existing object_new_with_type(). Who's going to take this one? Still more review needed? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2LHY-0007tY-7T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:54:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2LHX-0001F9-Gw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:54:28 -0400 From: Markus Armbruster References: <20161005133530.5702-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 17:54:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161005133530.5702-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> ("Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZIidz?= message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2016 15:35:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87k2ckwll0.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] qom+coccinelle: add and use object_new_with_class() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Rob Herring , Igor Mitsyanko , Alexander Graf , Alistair Francis , Max Filippov , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= , Richard Henderson Radim Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99 writes: > This series performs a simple replacement of > object_new(object_class_get_name(class)) by object_new_with_class(class) > in the spirit of existing object_new_with_type(). Who's going to take this one? Still more review needed?