diff for duplicates of <87k2dm6git.fsf@toke.dk> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 7b90d72..a1df6d9 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes: -> Toke H?iland-J?rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes: +> Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes: > >>>>> This is great work but due to the regressions I'm not sure if this >>>>> will be ready for 4.9. To get more testing time I wonder if we should @@ -10,10 +10,13 @@ Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes: >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>> ->>>> Well, now that we understand what is causing the throughput regressions, +>>>> Well, now that we understand what is causing the throughput regression= +s, >>>> fixing them should be fairly straight forward (yeah, famous last words, ->>>> but still...). I already have a patch for the fast path and will go poke ->>>> at the slow path next. It'll probably require another workaround or two, +>>>> but still...). I already have a patch for the fast path and will go po= +ke +>>>> at the slow path next. It'll probably require another workaround or tw= +o, >>>> so I guess it won't be the architecturally clean ideal solution; but it >>>> would make it possible to have something that works for 4.9 and then >>>> iterate for a cleaner design for 4.10. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 663bee3..eca3ab7 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -6,14 +6,19 @@ "ref\0871t1g4thz.fsf@toke.dk\0" "ref\0877fb8ug0x.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com\0" "From\0Toke H\303\270iland-J\303\270rgensen <toke@toke.dk>\0" - "Subject\0[ath9k-devel] [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software\tqueues.\0" - "Date\0Wed, 05 Oct 2016 14:09:49 -0000\0" - "To\0ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software queues.\0" + "Date\0Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:02:02 +0200\0" + "To\0Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>\0" + "Cc\0linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" + make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net + ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org + Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu> + " Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:\n" "\n" - "> Toke H?iland-J?rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:\n" + "> Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:\n" ">\n" ">>>>> This is great work but due to the regressions I'm not sure if this\n" ">>>>> will be ready for 4.9. To get more testing time I wonder if we should\n" @@ -23,10 +28,13 @@ ">>>>>\n" ">>>>> Thoughts?\n" ">>>>\n" - ">>>> Well, now that we understand what is causing the throughput regressions,\n" + ">>>> Well, now that we understand what is causing the throughput regression=\n" + "s,\n" ">>>> fixing them should be fairly straight forward (yeah, famous last words,\n" - ">>>> but still...). I already have a patch for the fast path and will go poke\n" - ">>>> at the slow path next. It'll probably require another workaround or two,\n" + ">>>> but still...). I already have a patch for the fast path and will go po=\n" + "ke\n" + ">>>> at the slow path next. It'll probably require another workaround or tw=\n" + "o,\n" ">>>> so I guess it won't be the architecturally clean ideal solution; but it\n" ">>>> would make it possible to have something that works for 4.9 and then\n" ">>>> iterate for a cleaner design for 4.10.\n" @@ -63,4 +71,4 @@ "\n" -Toke -076d37b00ba61ed972d79594c29c6469ee4b8a56f22354908f24e93f484a29c6 +7cec185fdf9dcec08531be1705de7e1d2e4327b0bcd385d92e105ff89bd67b03
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.