From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 15:01:05 -0500 Subject: Dropping "depends on SMP" for HAVE_ARM_TWD -- take 2 In-Reply-To: <20151006193815.GI12338@codeaurora.org> References: <560E53E3.7070207@free.fr> <560E8584.8000207@free.fr> <20151002180255.GK12338@codeaurora.org> <56138485.4090600@free.fr> <20151006193815.GI12338@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <87k2qz22da.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Stephen Boyd writes: > On 10/06, Mason wrote: >> On 02/10/2015 20:02, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >> > The warning has been removed in commit 5028090d1da1 (ARM: 8434/1: >> > Revert "7655/1: smp_twd: make twd_local_timer_of_register() no-op >> > for nosmp", 2015-09-14) sitting in linux-next. Oddly, that commit >> > doesn't remove the depends on SMP for the Kconfig. So it seems >> > that we can apply this patch and everyone is happy? We could also >> > drop the "if SMP" part of most of the platform selects if anyone >> > actually cares. >> > >> > ---8<---- >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> > index 369791fb619c..be64d9d604c3 100644 >> > --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> > +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> > @@ -1389,7 +1389,6 @@ config HAVE_ARM_ARCH_TIMER >> > >> > config HAVE_ARM_TWD >> > bool >> > - depends on SMP >> > select CLKSRC_OF if OF >> > help >> > This options enables support for the ARM timer and watchdog unit >> >> Hello Stephen, >> >> Should I make a formal submission for the above patch to be accepted? > > No. I believe Felipe is going to update commit 5028090d1da1 to > remove the depends on. Already did it. Should be in next shortly. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 818 bytes Desc: not available URL: