From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39695)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1YnnSp-0002SR-3y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:21:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1YnnSk-0005Ug-AL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:21:11 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56605)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <armbru@redhat.com>) id 1YnnSk-0005UY-3L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:21:06 -0400
Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3UCL5VQ025681
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256
	verify=FAIL)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:21:05 -0400
From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
References: <1430343306-6152-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:21:02 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1430343306-6152-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> (Eric
	Blake's message of "Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:35:03 -0600")
Message-ID: <87k2wtst75.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] parse 'null' literal in QMP
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com

Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> writes:

> Here's my attempt to merge the best points of Markus' approach [1]
> (patches 16-18 of that series - benefit of smaller patches and fewer
> malloc calls) and my approach [2] (benefit of a testsuite addition
> and more detailed commit messages), while fixing the typos that both
> of us had in v1.
>
> [1]https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg00342.html
> [2]https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg00623.html

Looks ready.  Luiz?