From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Korsgaard Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 20:05:05 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/5] dash: bump to version 0.5.8-1 In-Reply-To: <5435748A.3090106@zacarias.com.ar> (Gustavo Zacarias's message of "Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:29:46 -0300") References: <1412774389-11297-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <87eguieaky.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <5435748A.3090106@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <87k34acu9a.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias writes: > On 10/08/2014 02:27 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >> So what about bash? Which one should "win"? bash? > We can't make that determination on the user behalf if he selected > multiple shells, random order will prevail. > However we can say that any of these is more feature-complete than what > busybox has to offer. Random is not good, so I suggest we either: - Only do it for bash like today - Provide an option for the user to select - Decide on a fixed priority order (E.G. busybox->dash->zsh->bash) and tell people to use a post-build script if they are not happy with it -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard