From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 71-19-161-253.dedicated.allstream.net ([71.19.161.253] helo=nsa.nbspaymentsolutions.com) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1VjcG8-0007wV-AW for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:58:01 +0000 Received: from DeadDuck (unknown [172.20.177.82]) by nsa.nbspaymentsolutions.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED03A3FC4CD for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:59:51 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Pringlemeir To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: VF610+ColdFireM54418 controller. References: <87siupheou.fsf@nbsps.com> Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 16:52:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87siupheou.fsf@nbsps.com> (Bill Pringlemeir's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2013 12:01:21 -0500") Message-ID: <87k3g1h17n.fsf@nbsps.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 21 Nov 2013, bpringlemeir@nbsps.com wrote: > All registers are 32bit R/W unless noted, from section 31.3 of the > Vybrid NAND chapter. > Is there an existing driver that can be adapted? It looks like the mpc5125 SOC has the same NAND controller; the CPU/SOC has support in the tree, but no NAND controller in mpc5125twr.dts. The registers and buffers differ from the mpc5121 NAND controller which is in the tree; the difference between the mpc5125+vf610+ColdFireM54418 NAND controller and the mpc5121 NAND controller look significant to me. Fwiw, Bill Pringlemeir.