From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juan Quintela Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for 2013-04-09 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:09:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3obbxtm.fsf@elfo.elfo> References: <877gkdf84i.fsf@elfo.elfo> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: qemu-devel qemu-devel To: KVM devel mailing list Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39544 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933469Ab3DIOJD (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:09:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877gkdf84i.fsf@elfo.elfo> (Juan Quintela's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:46:05 +0200") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Juan Quintela wrote: > Hi Today there is a call, there was agenda but I didn't noticed that it was sent as private mail to me: >>From Abel Gordon: I would like to present a technical report we just published that describes the design and evaluation of the work we did to improve virtual net/block I/O scalability and performance based on vhost and hosting multiple KVM guests. We started some discussion in the qemu-mailing list about this work and dataplane: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-02/msg02702.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-03/msg00028.html The report can be downloaded from the following link: http://goo.gl/RKppy (full link: http://domino.research.ibm.com/library/cyberdig.nsf/1e4115aea78b6e7c85256b360066f0d4/479e3578ed05bfac85257b4200427735!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,h-0319 ) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPZES-00045W-Fm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:09:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPZEN-0008JL-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:09:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPZEN-0008JD-KM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:09:03 -0400 From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <877gkdf84i.fsf@elfo.elfo> (Juan Quintela's message of "Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:46:05 +0200") References: <877gkdf84i.fsf@elfo.elfo> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:09:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3obbxtm.fsf@elfo.elfo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-04-09 Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: KVM devel mailing list Cc: qemu-devel qemu-devel Juan Quintela wrote: > Hi Today there is a call, there was agenda but I didn't noticed that it was sent as private mail to me: >>From Abel Gordon: I would like to present a technical report we just published that describes the design and evaluation of the work we did to improve virtual net/block I/O scalability and performance based on vhost and hosting multiple KVM guests. We started some discussion in the qemu-mailing list about this work and dataplane: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-02/msg02702.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-03/msg00028.html The report can be downloaded from the following link: http://goo.gl/RKppy (full link: http://domino.research.ibm.com/library/cyberdig.nsf/1e4115aea78b6e7c85256b360066f0d4/479e3578ed05bfac85257b4200427735!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,h-0319 )