From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53918 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PZlRB-000281-BB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:31:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZlR9-0001me-Js for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:31:05 -0500 Received: from adelie.canonical.com ([91.189.90.139]:47670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PZlR9-0001mO-Fk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:31:03 -0500 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com ([91.189.90.37]) by adelie.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian)) id 1PZlR7-0000Vh-HN for ; Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:31:01 +0000 Received: from loganberry.canonical.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by loganberry.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F71F2E8161 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:30:53 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 14:23:25 -0000 From: EsbenHaabendal Sender: bounces@canonical.com References: <20100219141749.18571.12250.malonedeb@wampee.canonical.com> Message-Id: <87k4im3w2q.fsf@eha.doredevelopment.dk> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow Errors-To: bounces@canonical.com Reply-To: Bug 524447 <524447@bugs.launchpad.net> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Michael Tokarev writes: > 03.01.2011 16:23, EsbenHaabendal wrote: >> How should I interpret "Fix Released"? >> = >> qemu in maverick is still 0.12.5 and 0.12.3 in lucid. > > Not all the world is ubuntu. In qemu (and qemu-kvm) the > issue is fixed in 0.13, which were released quite some > time ago. > >> Will this not be fixed in current stable LTS and non-LTS releases? > > There's no "stable LTS" and "non-LTS" releases in qemu, > there are plain releases. Ok. I see. And the current importance for libvirt (Ubuntu) and qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) is marked as "Wishlist". So my question goes to these two components. When can we expect to see this fixed in current Ubuntu releases, of which I currently count at least maverick and lucid. -- = You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524447 Title: virsh save is very slow Status in libvirt virtualization API: Unknown Status in QEMU: Fix Released Status in =E2=80=9Clibvirt=E2=80=9D package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in =E2=80=9Cqemu-kvm=E2=80=9D package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: As reported here: http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-Decembe= r/msg00203.html "virsh save" is very slow - it writes the image at around 1MB/sec on my tes= t system. (I think I saw a bug report for this issue on Fedora's bugzilla, but I can'= t find it now...) Confirmed under Karmic.