From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] OMAP: idle path errata fixes Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:49:31 -0800 Message-ID: <87k4jdypx0.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1291395818-8639-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:38640 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757839Ab0LNDth (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:49:37 -0500 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so98462gyb.19 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:49:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1291395818-8639-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:03:33 -0600") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Nishanth Menon Cc: linux-omap , Charulatha Varadarajan , Jean Pihet , Santosh Shilimkar , Tao Hu , Tony Lindgren , Vishwanath Sripathy Hi Nishanth, Nishanth Menon writes: > as discussed in [1], here is step 2 - idle path errata fixes. > this is the next rev incorporating comments from V2 post > of this series. I had a couple small comments on individual patches. In addition, in the next series, can you report the platforms it was tested on, and how it was tested (retention idle/suspend, off idle/suspend, CPUidle enabled?, etc.) I tested this series (and Jean's cleanup patch) on 34xx/n900 with retention idle & suspend and off idle & suspend with and without CPUidle enabled.) Also, when posting an updated series, can you update the version of all patches in the series, even if they are unchanged? This makes more more explicit versioning, keeps things clearer in patchwork and avoids problems with dumb mailers who thread by subject only. Also, please Cc linux-arm-kernel when posting the next version. Thanks, Kevin