All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zlatko Calusic <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
To: Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl>
Cc: "David J. Fred" <djf@ic.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, Linux-MM List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: unexpected paging during large file reads in 2.1.127
Date: 12 Nov 1998 23:45:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k910bkdl.fsf@atlas.CARNet.hr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Rik van Riel's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 1998 14:39:53 +0100 (CET)"

Rik van Riel <H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> writes:

> On 12 Nov 1998, Zlatko Calusic wrote:
> > "David J. Fred" <djf@ic.net> writes:
> > 
> > > Summary: When doing large file reads from disk the system pages
> > >          unexpectedly causing moderate to severe degradation in I/O
> > >          and overall system performance even though there is plenty of
> > >          memory.
> > 
> > Page cache is definitely too aggressive on recent kernels. I
> > developed a small patch that avoids excessive swapouts. It helps
> > kswapd to have less trouble reusing pages from page cache. 
> 
> Agreed, we should do something about that.
> 
> > +			age_page(page);
> > +			age_page(page);
> >  			age_page(page);
> 
> Do I hear "priority paging"? :))
> 
> >        count_max = (limit<<2) >> (priority>>1);
> >        count_min = (limit<<2) >> (priority);
> 
> Maybe increasing these has the same effect but with
> the advantage of keeping page aging intact.
> 

Maybe, but then again maybe not.

I have a feeling that change like that could easily make kswapd a CPU
pig.

We are aging pages, so that they don't get reaped easily, and then
trying to compensate that with heavier scanning. Doesn't sound like a
good idea. Sizif's job.

But still, looks interesting, so I'm just going to compile one test
kernel with bigger count limits, for the fun's sake... :)

[Cc: Linux-MM]

Regards,
-- 
Posted by Zlatko Calusic           E-mail: <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
	  A chicken is an egg's way of producing more eggs.
--
This is a majordomo managed list.  To unsubscribe, send a message with
the body 'unsubscribe linux-mm me@address' to: majordomo@kvack.org

       reply	other threads:[~1998-11-12 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.981112143712.20473B-100000@mirkwood.dummy.home>
1998-11-12 22:45 ` Zlatko Calusic [this message]
1998-11-16 19:59   ` unexpected paging during large file reads in 2.1.127 Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-11-16 20:48     ` Rik van Riel
1998-11-16 23:05       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-11-17  1:21         ` Zlatko Calusic
1998-11-17 12:00           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-11-18 22:50             ` Zlatko Calusic
1998-11-17  6:42         ` Rik van Riel
1998-11-17 12:06           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1998-11-17 20:25             ` Rik van Riel
1998-11-16 21:56     ` Zlatko Calusic
1998-11-12 23:18 ` Zlatko Calusic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k910bkdl.fsf@atlas.CARNet.hr \
    --to=zlatko.calusic@carnet.hr \
    --cc=H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl \
    --cc=djf@ic.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.