All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: <himanshu.girotra@intel.com>
Cc: <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <x.wang@intel.com>,
	<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 i-g-t] lib/intel_pat: Cache PAT config for unprivileged processes
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:22:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ldg3s5bp.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87qzpyroy5.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

On Thu, 05 Mar 2026 12:39:14 -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>
> On Thu, 05 Mar 2026 10:54:31 -0800, <himanshu.girotra@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Himanshu Girotra <himanshu.girotra@intel.com>
> >
> > Commit 4e59b8e7779b ("lib/intel_pat: use kernel debugfs as
> > authoritative PAT source for Xe") changed the Xe PAT lookup to
> > read from debugfs, which requires root access. Some xe_oa subtests
> > fork a child process that drops root privileges before performing
> > GPU operations that internally need the PAT write-back index.
> > After dropping root, the debugfs read fails.
> >
> > Fix this by caching the PAT configuration in struct xe_device at
> > xe_device_get() time. Since xe_device_get() is called while still
> > root, the cache is available to forked children even after
> > igt_drop_root(). Tests that open a new fd after forking must call
> > xe_device_get() explicitly before dropping root to populate the
> > cache for that fd.
> >
> > v2: Cache PAT in struct xe_device instead of a global static;
> >     drop the intel_pat_precache() helper — xe_device_get() already
> >     populates the cache, so call it directly in xe_oa before
> >     igt_drop_root() (Ashutosh Dixit)
> >
> > v3: Use pat_cache pointer, NULL indicates unpopulated cache;
> >     remove redundant xe_oa.c change (Ashutosh Dixit)
> >
> >     Add FIXME for multi-GPU (Zbigniew Kempczyński)
> >
> > v4: nit fixes and use forward declaration in xe_query.h (Ashutosh Dixit)
>
> Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

Thanks for the quick turnaround on the fix. The patch is now merged!

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-07 21:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-05 18:54 [PATCH v4 i-g-t] lib/intel_pat: Cache PAT config for unprivileged processes himanshu.girotra
2026-03-05 20:39 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2026-03-07 21:22   ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2026-03-06  0:44 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for lib/intel_pat: Cache PAT config for unprivileged processes (rev4) Patchwork
2026-03-06  1:04 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-03-06 19:53 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-03-07  4:53 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ldg3s5bp.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=himanshu.girotra@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=nishit.sharma@intel.com \
    --cc=x.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.