From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70D5AC2D0CD for ; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uH22E-0007aP-7i; Mon, 19 May 2025 11:04:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uH228-0007a6-Ff for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2025 11:04:07 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1uH226-0002Jr-QY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 May 2025 11:04:04 -0400 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A87720409; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:03:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1747667039; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f5FsYGS7PxyUSiF5tM1P5NsRSyme9AjCsJ4ZYRNeSmo=; b=cnLx2SBFOyugcLkmYBqTjKOZ0g+keFVps7FevEotUrzCib7TqCU5dUOAn7rcLupc7HBEtq 2cnbfZNUVLoXlIcoxgHA8FM7fDI25zhLyshsrL93h2mPnZc6oYxFIEEdKfz3+vcWkzI/Ll X4B0NAsZC+/8U4CeKZEiywC7oymTFFc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1747667039; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f5FsYGS7PxyUSiF5tM1P5NsRSyme9AjCsJ4ZYRNeSmo=; b=aFTQUjcuAFhV7/FcxmdlUwSQDQjThpZBinafjm6GOe6baLwvneNwkew1LC+9WOIZ5KPI/g JeVOMiB/QGgvbSAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1747667039; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f5FsYGS7PxyUSiF5tM1P5NsRSyme9AjCsJ4ZYRNeSmo=; b=cnLx2SBFOyugcLkmYBqTjKOZ0g+keFVps7FevEotUrzCib7TqCU5dUOAn7rcLupc7HBEtq 2cnbfZNUVLoXlIcoxgHA8FM7fDI25zhLyshsrL93h2mPnZc6oYxFIEEdKfz3+vcWkzI/Ll X4B0NAsZC+/8U4CeKZEiywC7oymTFFc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1747667039; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=f5FsYGS7PxyUSiF5tM1P5NsRSyme9AjCsJ4ZYRNeSmo=; b=aFTQUjcuAFhV7/FcxmdlUwSQDQjThpZBinafjm6GOe6baLwvneNwkew1LC+9WOIZ5KPI/g JeVOMiB/QGgvbSAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600AC1372E; Mon, 19 May 2025 15:03:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id WiLIB15IK2g3QgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 19 May 2025 15:03:58 +0000 From: Fabiano Rosas To: Nicholas Piggin , Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Nicholas Piggin , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Marcel Apfelbaum , Laurent Vivier , Phil Dennis-Jordan , Bernhard Beschow , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 21/22] tests/qtest/xhci: Test USB Mass Storage relaxed CSW order In-Reply-To: <20250502033047.102465-22-npiggin@gmail.com> References: <20250502033047.102465-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20250502033047.102465-22-npiggin@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 12:03:55 -0300 Message-ID: <87ldqs7ick.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.77 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-2.97)[99.87%]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[12]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,nongnu.org,redhat.com,philjordan.eu,linaro.org]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com,redhat.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo, suse.de:email, suse.de:mid] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Nicholas Piggin writes: > This adds a qtest for the improvement to the MSD protocol that > allows an IN packet before the CBW packet. Send a CSW packet > before a zero-length CBW command packet is sent. This test would > fail with the MSD change reverted. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin #define CBW_SIGNATURE 0x43425355 #define CSW_SIGNATURE 0x53425355 would be nice Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas #define CBW_SIGNATURE 0x43425355 #define CSW_SIGNATURE 0x53425355 would be nice Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas