From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8EA366; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731095630; cv=none; b=X3cvV/yn15hEsxX9qZ5CyJPhpJtchr0M6YpMDb6cTDwcJXzdQzfxG30j+xyNv8t/LcWT0tHoMAUyrEYdaWqqL9UuXUZvXysUcskg+VatJ/yxQevGt9YmGMhlCT4/5UyGQ4zjZ6uLTsEGVxnjWCQ9VVy/Xhiq3pcFplXZtAjChVQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731095630; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/oidlqrNQ3l/EFyWYvYeFCVPhQshkZt+TNAXopXR2wY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OOio4FISvcR5t22CunNfVF9PMybSJd6wqNvdvgEkO+Si9/65m8r+Q5HhRxtDQ33Rl36sA0MBgjZsJAou9fKJ79BwPPD4shrpKX02XonNMest6X1jBPFN0x4CidSSNBzfM/G2pGQ/KHodrWOr1i5ghHBYPnToZABCFvuasxF3e6Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=O0fPdLDr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="O0fPdLDr" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 5F50542C17 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1731095628; bh=9XYDoCikxKxiTtZaLvgudI4lTOoyfuMFGD8Ozfp2uzY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=O0fPdLDr7Sr5d3Vt751Gl4Z+gyOPfl/3/onxyN5hF6oyzE8pwyb5JwDeyFQY4a4FG 0g+bAicQEr09BOgZp+sAtHBViOytAiLdoEtUvQwuwNoZJjQIwIDPF+1zNHsaFrwAz5 KB4bnLFCNiQJDYAcvu6yZUPEjBsXDIyXzYrxEYEpEgcw1XZIXWG0aCv12o+aDf8Lhr 7kWZrzYtNJhsTaHm9BL+gw6zDccCbk4PwhootnZ6rME/bEy0R2I6iWh+bX5woHmkCZ 0pf5K2Tfe9ACV4M3xnCKeUJz+Owzqy6yTT4MHGnLIrvlemw3Zx0ZBHsUb9mO9expsR lcYgh2YNCbjpQ== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:5e00:625::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F50542C17; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 19:53:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: anish kumar Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ALSA: machine: update documentation In-Reply-To: References: <20241108192413.10751-1-yesanishhere@gmail.com> <87y11twmlx.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 12:53:47 -0700 Message-ID: <87ldxtwlh0.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [I suspect that your HTML email will keep your response off the list - don't do that.] anish kumar writes: > On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 11:29 AM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > anish kumar writes: > > +In the above struct, dai=E2=80=99s are registered using names but you= can pass > > +either dai name or device tree node but not both. Also, names used he= re > > +for cpu/codec/platform dais should be globally unique. > > + > > +Additionaly below example macro can be used to register cpu, codec and > > +platform dai:: > > + > > +SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEFS(wm2200_cpu_dsp, > > + DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CPU("samsung-i2s.0")), > > + DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_CODEC("spi0.0", "wm0010-sdi1")), > > + DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_PLATFORM("samsung-i2s.0"))); > > + > > This will not give you the literal block you were hoping for. Please > actually build the docs after making changes and look at the results. > > I was not hoping for literally code block but rather just a tab. I just p= asted Bagas comment as I > thought it is better way to say that about the change.=20 The "::" you added above introduces a literal block. Yes, that is what you were hoping for. jon