Re: [PULL 00/20] Migration 20230420 patches

[Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>]

Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com> wrote:
> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 4/22/23 10:21, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On 4/20/23 14:17, Juan Quintela wrote:

>> I'll note that mips32 and armv6 (that is, *not* debian's armv7 based
>> armhf distro) are the only hosts we have that don't have an atomic
>> 8-byte operation.
>
> This is the kind of trouble that I don'k now what to do.  I am pretty
> sure that nobody is goigng to migrate a host that has so much RAM than
> needs a 64bit counter in that two architectures (or any 32 architectures
> for what is worth).
>
> A couple of minutes after sending the 1st email, I considederd sending
> another one saying "my toolchain lies better than yours".
>
> I moved the atomic operations that do the buildcheck and run make again:
>
> $ rm -f qemu-system-mips*
> $ time make
>
> [....]
>
> [2/5] Linking target qemu-system-mipsel
> [3/5] Linking target qemu-system-mips
> [4/5] Linking target qemu-system-mips64el
> [5/5] Linking target qemu-system-mips64
>
> So clearly my toolchain is lying O:-)

And here I am.
Wearing a brow paper bag on my head for week.

These are emulatores for mips.  Not cross-compiled to run on MIPS.

/me hides on the hills in shame.

Later, Juan.