From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Ma\, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest\@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, lkp <lkp@intel.com>,
"akpm\@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"axboe\@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"christian.brauner\@ubuntu.com" <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
"containers\@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"jannh\@google.com" <jannh@google.com>,
"keescook\@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"kernel-hardening\@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm\@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"oleg\@redhat.com" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"torvalds\@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user_ns
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:24:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <06bb27f1d79243febf9ddc4633c4e084@intel.com> (XinjianX Ma's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 01:19:52 +0000")
"Ma, XinjianX" <xinjianx.ma@intel.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>> ...
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com
> Sorry, but <> around email address is needed
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
The change is already tested and pushed out so I really don't want to
mess with it. Especially as I am aiming to send it to Linus on
Wednesday after it has had a chance to pass through linux-next and
whatever automated tests are there.
What does copying and pasting the Reported-by: tag as included in
your original report cause to break?
At this point I suspect that the danger of fat fingering something
far outweighs whatever benefits might be gained by surrounding the
email address with <> marks.
Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-24 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-17 4:03 [PATCH v11 5/9] Reimplement RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE on top of ucounts Ma, XinjianX
2021-08-17 15:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-08-18 13:11 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-08-19 1:50 ` Ma, XinjianX
2021-08-19 15:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-08-19 17:26 ` Alexey Gladkov
2021-08-23 21:06 ` [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user_ns Eric W. Biederman
2021-08-24 1:19 ` Ma, XinjianX
2021-08-24 3:24 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133 \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xinjianx.ma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.