From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45883C31E40 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 06:32:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C099208C4 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 06:32:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C099208C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56620 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvyRX-0001Gy-7b for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 02:32:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvyR9-0000p8-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 02:31:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvyR8-00052K-Df for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 02:31:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvyR8-00051G-8N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 02:31:38 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5FC93073A23; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 06:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (ovpn-117-142.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.142]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6100460BF1; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 06:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D14AE113864E; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 08:31:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= References: <20190808164117.23348-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 08:31:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20190808164117.23348-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org> ("Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e=22's?= message of "Thu, 8 Aug 2019 17:41:10 +0100") Message-ID: <87lfw2alzb.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.43]); Fri, 09 Aug 2019 06:31:36 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/7] softfloat header cleanups X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Alex Benn=C3=A9e writes: > Hi Markus, > > As promised here is a softfloat specific follow-up to your headers > clean-up series: > > From: Markus Armbruster > Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 17:14:06 +0200 > Message-Id: <20190806151435.10740-1-armbru@redhat.com> > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/29] Tame a few "touch this, recompil= e the world" headers > > The first few patches do a little light re-organising of the header > files and some renaming. The remaining patches then rationalise the > header usage in the targets mostly by removing the inclusion of > softfloat.h from cpu.h which is most likely to trigger the largest > number of rebuilds. Neat! > I'm happy for you to pull these straight into your larger series if > you want otherwise I'll collect tags and submit once the tree > re-opens. What about this: I post my v3 of my series to address the reviews of v2, you post a v2 of yours if necessary. Once both are ready, I do the pull request. If yours is ready, but mine needs another respin, I can pick yours into my respin, to take it off your hands. Okay?