From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNEJT-0005qv-Dk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 04:51:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNEJO-000274-IN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 04:51:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::442]:36839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gNEJO-00025o-CE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 04:51:46 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id z13-v6so20465338wrs.3 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 01:51:44 -0800 (PST) References: <20181108134139.31666-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <086b3ab4-6845-3884-bdd8-7c776d2e5d00@gmail.com> From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= In-reply-to: <086b3ab4-6845-3884-bdd8-7c776d2e5d00@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 09:51:42 +0000 Message-ID: <87lg5ud5xt.fsf@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: list myself as maintainer for various Arm boards List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell , Rob Herring , Thomas Huth , Patch Tracking , Igor Mitsyanko , Markus Armbruster , Beniamino Galvani , Jan Kiszka , Antony Pavlov , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Alistair Francis writes: > On 14/11/2018 3:12 am, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wr= ote: >>> These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this >>> patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should >>> be, but the patch talks about orphaned boards and these four all have >>> active QEMU maintainers listed. >> >> Yeah, I was planning to improve the commit message, >> something along the lines of an extra para: >> >> "The Xilinx boards are maintained, but patches to >> them go via the target-arm tree, so add myself as a >> maintainer there too." >> >> Really this is because we're overloading "maintainer" >> to mean both "this person cares about and is the >> primary reviewer and yes/no decision for them" and >> also "this person is responsible for getting the >> patches into the tree". Perhaps we should instead >> define a new letter tag for the latter ? > > What about adding a "P:" tag for pull request sender? Don't all pull requests generally come from the relevant T: (tree)? We could either extend that or just state the first M: in the list is the person who owns the relevant tree. > > Alistair > >> >> thanks >> -- PMM >> -- Alex Benn=C3=A9e