From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e35.co.us.ibm.com (e35.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D4BF1A000B for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:34:04 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e35.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:34:01 -0700 Received: from d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.202.179) by e35.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:33:58 -0700 X-IBM-Helo: d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com X-IBM-MailFrom: stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com X-IBM-RcptTo: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.24]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0DD19D803E for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:21:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (d01av05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.195]) by b01cxnp22034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u1G7XqsS27853054 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:33:52 GMT Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u1G7ULl1026255 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:30:22 -0500 Received: from birb.localdomain ([9.83.1.95]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with SMTP id u1G7U9RS025953; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 02:30:20 -0500 Received: by birb.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 472E92286E20; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:33:37 +1100 (AEDT) From: Stewart Smith To: Chris Austen , "andrew\@aj.id.au" Cc: openbmc-patches , openbmc Subject: Re: [PATCH phosphor-host-ipmid v2] IPMI Get IP Support In-Reply-To: <201602120312.u1C3CHwh000341@d01av01.pok.ibm.com> References: <201602120312.u1C3CHwh000341@d01av01.pok.ibm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+24~gbceb651 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 18:33:37 +1100 Message-ID: <87lh6lkt2m.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 16021607-0013-0000-0000-00001CE62A6B X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:34:04 -0000 Chris Austen writes: > Would it make sense to integrate gerrit? Do you have a place to run it publicly on the internet? This is the sticking point in any discussion on self-hosting such tools. review on the list does work, as does patchwork, and it requires no special tools for people doing review that require a working internet connection. It would also be consistent with similar open source projects (e.g. skiboot, linux, buildroot, petitboot) so we wouldn't end up with too much excessive variation on developer workflow. While I do understand that IBM does not like to provide people with standards compliant internet email... this shouldn't be a driving factor on process, it should be a driving factor for people to get actual internet email accounts though. -- Stewart Smith OPAL Architect, IBM.