From: Jakub Sitnicki <jsitnicki@gmail.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] staging: rtl8188eu: stop using DBG_88E
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:03:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lhedjqc0.fsf@frog.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150718044607.GA14213@sudip-PC>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 06:46 AM CEST, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:33:55PM +0200, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:28 PM CEST, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Stop using DBG_88E which is a custom macro for printing debugging
>> > messages. Instead start using pr_debug and in the process define
>> > pr_fmt.
>>
>> In the end, don't we want to use netdev_dbg() everywhere where we work
>> with a struct net_device? And use dev_dbg() everywhere where we work
>> with a struct device (or a struct usb_interface)?
> Looks like in some places we can get net_device from usb_interface.
>
> struct dvobj_priv *dvobj = usb_get_intfdata(pusb_intf);
> struct adapter *padapter = dvobj->if1;
> struct net_device *pnetdev = padapter->pnetdev;
You're right providing that the net_device has been successfully
allocated and hasn't been deallocated yet. There are at least a couple
of pr_debug() calls that couldn't be converted to netdev_dbg(), one in
rtw_drv_init() and another in rtw_dev_remove(), because the net_device
is not available, if I'm not wrong.
>> At least that's how I understand commit 8f26b8376faa ("checkpatch:
>> update suggested printk conversions") description:
>>
>> Direct conversion of printk(KERN_<LEVEL>... to pr_<level> isn't the
>> preferred conversion when a struct net_device or struct device is
>> available.
>>
>> Do you think it is worth going straight for netdev_dbg()/dev_dbg() to
>> avoid redoing it later?
> At the end it should be netdev_* or dev_* and if both are not available
> then pr_*. Here my main intention was to remove the custom defined
> macro. And while doing this it is easier to use a script to reduce the
> chances of error. Now that the custom macro is out of the way we can
> concentrate on converting it to netdev_* or dev_*.
>>
>> >
> <snip>
>> >
>> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "R8188EU: " fmt
>> > #include <osdep_service.h>
>> > #include <drv_types.h>
>> > #include <recv_osdep.h>
>>
>> If we're going to stay with pr_debug(), using KBUILD_MODNAME seems to be
>> the convention among drivers when defining pr_fmt():
>>
>> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> yes, KBUILD_MODNAME is the usual convention but you will also find many
> places where that has not been used. Here I have used R8188EU to keep it
> same for all the messages that will be printed from the other files of
> this driver else it might be confusing for the user.
I see your point. If consistent log prefix is the goal do you think it
would make sense to change it to:
#define pr_fmt(fmt) DRIVER_PREFIX ": " fmt
... so the prefix is not defined in two places?
Cheers,
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-18 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-16 11:28 [PATCH 1/6] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unused function Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-16 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/6] staging: rtl8188eu: remove redundant NULL check Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-16 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/6] staging: rtl8188eu: remove goto label Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-17 11:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-17 11:25 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-17 11:47 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-17 12:03 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-16 11:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unneeded variable Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-16 11:28 ` [PATCH 5/6] staging: rtl8188eu: stop using DBG_88E Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-17 15:33 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2015-07-18 4:46 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-18 18:03 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2015-07-20 5:29 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-07-16 11:28 ` [PATCH 6/6] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unneeded ret Sudip Mukherjee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lhedjqc0.fsf@frog.home \
--to=jsitnicki@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.