From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] kprobes: be more permissive when user specifies both symbol name and address
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 08:56:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lhrbhg86.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHz2CGUEJ9at2dwj-H-phKrkxO_B3Xt-ksBa7ZsWb2bOZ2nY=g@mail.gmail.com> (Jianyu Zhan's message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:50:08 +0800")
Hi Jianyu,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 20:50:08 +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> Sorry for the noise,
>
> plz add these Acked-by and Signed-off-by:
I think you'd better to send it as a formal patch.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com>
>
> Thanks,
> Jianyu Zhan
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Ingo,
>>
>> Here is the new patch with typo fixed.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> ---8<---
>>
>> Currently, if user specifies both symbol name and address, we just
>> bail out.
>>
>> This might be too rude. This patch makes it give more tolerance.
>> If both are specified, check address first, if the symbol found
>> does not match the one user specify, print a waring. If not found,
>> return -ENOENT, because some symbols might have muplitple instances,
>> we don't bother to check symbol name.
>> ---
>> Documentation/kprobes.txt | 4 +++-
>> kernel/kprobes.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/kprobes.txt b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> index 4bbeca8..663b5ad 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/kprobes.txt
>> @@ -358,7 +358,9 @@ to install a probepoint is known. This field is used to calculate the
>> probepoint.
>>
>> 3. Specify either the kprobe "symbol_name" OR the "addr". If both are
>> -specified, kprobe registration will fail with -EINVAL.
>> +specified, only check "addr", because some symbols might have multiple
>> +instances. If neither is specified, kprobe registration will fail
>> +with -EINVAL.
>>
>> 4. With CISC architectures (such as i386 and x86_64), the kprobes code
>> does not validate if the kprobe.addr is at an instruction boundary.
>> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> index 734e9a7..9768608 100644
>> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
>> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
>> @@ -1358,15 +1358,41 @@ static bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
>> static kprobe_opcode_t *kprobe_addr(struct kprobe *p)
>> {
>> kprobe_opcode_t *addr = p->addr;
>> + char namebuf[KSYM_NAME_LEN];
>> + const char *sym_name = NULL;
>> + unsigned long offset;
>>
>> - if ((p->symbol_name && p->addr) ||
>> - (!p->symbol_name && !p->addr))
>> + if (!p->symbol_name && !p->addr)
>> goto invalid;
>>
>> - if (p->symbol_name) {
>> + /*
>> + * Some symbols might have multiple instances,
>> + * so if both are specified, only check address.
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(p->addr && p->symbol_name)) {
>> + sym_name = kallsyms_lookup((unsigned long)(p->addr),
>> + NULL, &offset, NULL, namebuf);
>> + if (!sym_name)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> +
>> + if (strncmp(sym_name, p->symbol_name, KSYM_NAME_LEN)
>> + || offset != p->offset) {
>> + pr_err("Incorrect symbol or offset, should be "
>> + "symbol=%s, offset=%ld.\n", sym_name, offset);
>> + goto invalid;
>> + }
>> + } else if (p->symbol_name) {
>> + /* Only symbol case */
>> kprobe_lookup_name(p->symbol_name, addr);
>> if (!addr)
>> return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * Only address case.
>> + * Since we later will do a sanity check of the
>> + * address range in check_kprobe_address_safe(),
>> + * do nothing here.
>> + */
>> }
>>
>> addr = (kprobe_opcode_t *)(((char *)addr) + p->offset);
>> --
>> 2.0.0
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-doc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-29 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 7:34 [PATCH RESEND] kprobes: be more permissive when user specifies both symbol name and address Jianyu Zhan
2014-07-28 9:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2014-07-28 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-07-29 12:47 ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-07-29 12:50 ` Jianyu Zhan
2014-07-29 23:56 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2014-07-30 1:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lhrbhg86.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nasa4836@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.