From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jon Masters" <jcm@redhat.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
Subject: Re: No sysfs directory for openvswitch module when built-in
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:08:09 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lib1j9ni.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360087184.2857.2.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.solarflarecom.com>
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 16:29 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> writes:
>> > Hello, Rusty, Jesse,
>> >
>> > I met an interesting problem when I compile openvswitch module as a
>> > built-in (actually I compile ALL kernel modules as built-in), there is
>> > no /sys/module/openvswitch/ directory created by the kernel in this
>> > case.
>> ...
>> > What's worse, the user-space init script thinks openvswitch module is
>> > not loaded by checking the exist of this directory, therefore refuses
>> > to start.
>>
>> We only know built-in "modules" exist if we see a parameter or version
>> which mention them. Looking for /sys/module/openvswitch/ is almost as
>> flawed as looking in /proc/modules.
>>
>> I hacked up something which lists KBUILD_MODNAME for every element in my
>> kernel which did EXPORT_KERNEL or module_init, and most of them can
>> never be modules, though any could have parameters. Even if we changed
>> the build system so we could tell things which "could have been a
>> module", it's silly.
> [...]
>
> Isn't this information already provided by modules.builtin?
(CC's trimmed)
Thanks Ben, I learned something! I hadn't spotted that tristate vars
get set to Y instead of y. Subtle...
So we already have the infrastructure, and copy it into the module dir
(though logically it's a kernel property and belongs in /proc).
eg. lsmod doesn't list them, which is a bit weird, though modprobe
"succeeds".
A quick grep through my /etc shows 5 scripts using lsmod and 1 using
/sys/module to check for presence of modules. Should the kernel pad
/proc/modules with entries for builtins?
Thoughts welcome...
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-07 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 14:15 No sysfs directory for openvswitch module when built-in Cong Wang
2013-02-04 5:59 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-05 14:28 ` Cong Wang
2013-02-05 17:59 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-02-06 23:38 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2013-02-04 16:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-02-05 6:08 ` Ben Pfaff
2013-02-05 10:49 ` Cong Wang
2013-02-05 19:15 ` Ben Pfaff
2013-02-05 22:11 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lib1j9ni.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jesse@nicira.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.