From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH-V4 4/4] ARM: OMAP3+: am33xx: Add powerdomain & PRM support Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:44:02 -0700 Message-ID: <87lilg52i5.fsf@ti.com> References: <1333123435-27186-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <1333123435-27186-5-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <87bome579d.fsf@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from na3sys009aog131.obsmtp.com ([74.125.149.247]:38880 "EHLO na3sys009aog131.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760645Ab2D0UoD (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:44:03 -0400 Received: by pbcuo15 with SMTP id uo15so1698349pbc.11 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:44:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bome579d.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:49:02 -0700") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Vaibhav Hiremath Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, b-cousson@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, rnayak@ti.com, Afzal Mohammed , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Kevin Hilman writes: [...] > I also don't like all the cpu_is* checking currently in omap_hwmod.c > (which is here before you added this) and have an idea on how to clean > it up, I should have a patch by tomorrow for this. That should help > adding am33xx support here without needing all the cpu_is* checking. Series just posted: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=133555727831379&w=2 Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:44:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH-V4 4/4] ARM: OMAP3+: am33xx: Add powerdomain & PRM support In-Reply-To: <87bome579d.fsf@ti.com> (Kevin Hilman's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:49:02 -0700") References: <1333123435-27186-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <1333123435-27186-5-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <87bome579d.fsf@ti.com> Message-ID: <87lilg52i5.fsf@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Kevin Hilman writes: [...] > I also don't like all the cpu_is* checking currently in omap_hwmod.c > (which is here before you added this) and have an idea on how to clean > it up, I should have a patch by tomorrow for this. That should help > adding am33xx support here without needing all the cpu_is* checking. Series just posted: http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=133555727831379&w=2 Kevin