From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755990Ab2BFWlT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:41:19 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:39197 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753869Ab2BFWlS (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 17:41:18 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Pawel Moll , Dan Carpenter Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: re: params: _initcall-like kernel parameters In-Reply-To: <1328180937.1888.18.camel@hornet.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20120202095612.GA30632@elgon.mountain> <1328180937.1888.18.camel@hornet.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6.1-1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:46:50 +1030 Message-ID: <87liofip4d.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:08:57 +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > You're right, of course! The initcall_level_names is missing "early > parameters" string as the first element of the array. Well spotted - may > I asked what tool did you use to get this message? > > Rusty, do you want me to re-send the patch with this string fixed? I > think you have rebased it on top of your bool-param series? An incremental patch is preferred. I can fold it once it's done. Thanks, Rusty.