From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756733Ab1FHX3O (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:29:14 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:52540 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753678Ab1FHX3M (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:29:12 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Paolo Bonzini , Linux Virtualization , Linux Kernel Mailing List , qemu-devel Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "kvm\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: virtio scsi host draft specification, v3 In-Reply-To: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> References: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:58:50 +0930 Message-ID: <87lixbgax9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:43:49 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Hi all, > > after some preliminary discussion on the QEMU mailing list, I present a > draft specification for a virtio-based SCSI host (controller, HBA, you > name it). OK, I'm impressed. This is very well written and I doesn't make any of the obvious mistakes wrt. virtio. Unfortunately, I know almost nothing of SCSI, so I have to leave it to others to decide if this is actually useful and sufficient. I assume you have an implementation, as well? Thanks, Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: virtio scsi host draft specification, v3 Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:58:50 +0930 Message-ID: <87lixbgax9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "kvm\@vger.kernel.org" To: Paolo Bonzini , Linux Virtualization , Linux Kernel Mailing List , qemu-devel In-Reply-To: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:43:49 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Hi all, > > after some preliminary discussion on the QEMU mailing list, I present a > draft specification for a virtio-based SCSI host (controller, HBA, you > name it). OK, I'm impressed. This is very well written and I doesn't make any of the obvious mistakes wrt. virtio. Unfortunately, I know almost nothing of SCSI, so I have to leave it to others to decide if this is actually useful and sufficient. I assume you have an implementation, as well? Thanks, Rusty. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52872) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUSBY-0001J9-KH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:29:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUSBX-0007Y7-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:29:16 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:32978) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QUSBX-0007Xf-5X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 19:29:15 -0400 From: Rusty Russell In-Reply-To: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> References: <4DEE2B15.4090809@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 08:58:50 +0930 Message-ID: <87lixbgax9.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio scsi host draft specification, v3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Linux Virtualization , Linux Kernel Mailing List , qemu-devel Cc: Christoph Hellwig , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Hajnoczi , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Hannes Reinecke On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:43:49 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Hi all, > > after some preliminary discussion on the QEMU mailing list, I present a > draft specification for a virtio-based SCSI host (controller, HBA, you > name it). OK, I'm impressed. This is very well written and I doesn't make any of the obvious mistakes wrt. virtio. Unfortunately, I know almost nothing of SCSI, so I have to leave it to others to decide if this is actually useful and sufficient. I assume you have an implementation, as well? Thanks, Rusty.