From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 1/6 v2] OMAP2+: cpufreq: free up table on exit
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:26:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87liy39eac.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305704266-17623-2-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> (Nishanth Menon's message of "Wed, 18 May 2011 02:37:41 -0500")
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> writes:
> freq_table allocated by opp_init_cpufreq_table in omap_cpu_init
> needs to be freed in omap_cpu_exit.
Actually it needs to be freed by a corresponding OPP layer function.
IOW, what happens if the OPP core code switches from using kmalloc to
static tables, or something else? The cleanup should be done by the
same layer that does the init/alloc.
Kevin
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c | 3 +++
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
> index d53ce23..e38ebb8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/opp.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
>
> #include <asm/system.h>
> @@ -216,6 +217,8 @@ static int __cpuinit omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> static int omap_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> clk_exit_cpufreq_table(&freq_table);
> + kfree(freq_table);
> + freq_table = NULL;
> clk_put(mpu_clk);
> return 0;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-19 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <[PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 0/5] Cleanups for cpufreq>
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 0/6 v2] Cleanups for cpufreq Nishanth Menon
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 1/6 v2] OMAP2+: cpufreq: free up table on exit Nishanth Menon
2011-05-19 10:26 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-05-19 13:48 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 2/6 v2] OMAP2+: cpufreq: handle invalid cpufreq table Nishanth Menon
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 3/6 v2] OMAP2+: cpufreq: minor comment cleanup Nishanth Menon
2011-05-18 20:08 ` Todd Poynor
2011-05-18 20:34 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 4/6 v2] OMAP2: cpufreq: use clk_init_cpufreq_table if OPPs not available Nishanth Menon
2011-05-19 13:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-19 13:51 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-05-25 0:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-05-25 7:44 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 5/6 v2] OMAP2+: cpufreq: use cpufreq_frequency_table_target Nishanth Menon
2011-05-18 7:37 ` [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 6/6 v2] OMAP2+: cpufreq: fix freq_table leak Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87liy39eac.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.