All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
To: Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	baruch@tkos.co.il
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] evdev: fix evdev_write return value on partial writes
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:43:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lj26qzyy.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110127122625.GD15626@polaris.bitmath.org> (Henrik Rydberg's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:26:25 +0100")

>>>>> "Henrik" == Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@euromail.se> writes:

 Henrik> I won't argue against this case (with < 0) being frequent, but one
 Henrik> should really check "n < len" to be safe. Hopefully Dmitry has some
 Henrik> more input.
 >> 
 >> No, the point is that write (and read) can consume less data than
 >> requested, without it being an error. Robust userspace code should
 >> adjust buffer address / size and redo the work until all data is
 >> transferred or an error occurs.

 Henrik> Shouldn't the error be on (!len || len % smallest_acceptable_chunk),
 Henrik> then? Which makes me wonder about regressions - perhaps accumulating
 Henrik> partial writes in evdev is more safe from that perspective.

No, writing more than 1 complete struct should just consume the full
structs and return the number of bytes consumed, similar to all other
cases in the kernel where we return a length < count.

No sane userspace will write anything else than a multiple of
sizeof(input_event) though.

I doubt this will introduce any regressions (but you never know). The
only situation I can see is if userspace would fill out a proper struct
input_dev but use a wrong (too small) length in the write call. We used
to accept these, but with the patch here it will -EINVAL.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-27 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-27 10:03 [PATCHv2] evdev: fix evdev_write return value on partial writes Peter Korsgaard
2011-01-27 11:02 ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-01-27 11:21   ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-01-27 11:26     ` Baruch Siach
2011-01-27 11:29       ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-01-27 11:47     ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-01-27 12:04       ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-01-27 12:26         ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-01-27 12:43           ` Peter Korsgaard [this message]
2011-02-04  8:46             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-04 10:24               ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-02-04 11:00                 ` Peter Korsgaard
2011-02-04 11:23                   ` Henrik Rydberg
2011-02-04 17:15                     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-04 17:22                       ` Henrik Rydberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lj26qzyy.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk \
    --to=jacmet@sunsite.dk \
    --cc=baruch@tkos.co.il \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rydberg@euromail.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.