From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/11] OMAP: GPIO: Implement GPIO as a platform device Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:40:17 -0800 Message-ID: <87lj4i2nb2.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1290524213-395-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:42209 "EHLO mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752555Ab0KYBkY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:40:24 -0500 Received: by gxk22 with SMTP id 22so216695gxk.19 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:40:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1290524213-395-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> (Charulatha Varadarajan's message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:26:42 +0530") Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Varadarajan, Charulatha" Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, paul@pwsan.com, b-cousson@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, p-basak2@ti.com "Varadarajan, Charulatha" writes: > Implement OMAP GPIO module in platform device model. OMAP2+ specific = GPIO > module uses hwmod FW. > > Tested on OMAP2430, OMAP44430, OMAP3430 SDP boards, OMAP4430 Blaze bo= ard > and zoom3 board. Verified that this patch series does not break the O= MAP1 > build. > > Version History: > --------------- > v7 Series: > - Use gpio iclks as main_clk in OMAP3 & OMAP4 > - Implement GPIO as a platform device (use hwmod FW for OMAP2+) > and the implementation is similar to current GPIO code. Does not > modify the gpio suspend/ resume/ prepare for odle and resume after > idle code and these modifications would be done in a separate patch > series. This was suggested by Kevin in another internal email thread= =2E OK, I'm ready to merge this series, and we can deal with the runtime PM conversion in another series as that's where the tricky part lies. However, I'd like one more rebase/retest due to some other dependencies= =2E Can you rebase/retest using my current pm-core branch? That includes several dependencies that are also targetted for 2.6.38: - misc. PM fixes - i2c hwmod + runtime PM conversion (my pm-hwmod-i2c branch) - several board file changes/updates (Tony's devel-board branch) - hwmod core fixes (Paul's hwmod_a_2.6.38 branch) - wdt hwmod cleanups (Paul's wdt_2.6.38 branch) Also, can you collect the acks from Beno=C3=AEt and update your changel= ogs to include them. Thanks. Please be sure your board file changes are updated for the board file changes in the devel-board branch. Thanks,=20 Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:40:17 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v7 00/11] OMAP: GPIO: Implement GPIO as a platform device In-Reply-To: <1290524213-395-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> (Charulatha Varadarajan's message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:26:42 +0530") References: <1290524213-395-1-git-send-email-charu@ti.com> Message-ID: <87lj4i2nb2.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org "Varadarajan, Charulatha" writes: > Implement OMAP GPIO module in platform device model. OMAP2+ specific GPIO > module uses hwmod FW. > > Tested on OMAP2430, OMAP44430, OMAP3430 SDP boards, OMAP4430 Blaze board > and zoom3 board. Verified that this patch series does not break the OMAP1 > build. > > Version History: > --------------- > v7 Series: > - Use gpio iclks as main_clk in OMAP3 & OMAP4 > - Implement GPIO as a platform device (use hwmod FW for OMAP2+) > and the implementation is similar to current GPIO code. Does not > modify the gpio suspend/ resume/ prepare for odle and resume after > idle code and these modifications would be done in a separate patch > series. This was suggested by Kevin in another internal email thread. OK, I'm ready to merge this series, and we can deal with the runtime PM conversion in another series as that's where the tricky part lies. However, I'd like one more rebase/retest due to some other dependencies. Can you rebase/retest using my current pm-core branch? That includes several dependencies that are also targetted for 2.6.38: - misc. PM fixes - i2c hwmod + runtime PM conversion (my pm-hwmod-i2c branch) - several board file changes/updates (Tony's devel-board branch) - hwmod core fixes (Paul's hwmod_a_2.6.38 branch) - wdt hwmod cleanups (Paul's wdt_2.6.38 branch) Also, can you collect the acks from Beno?t and update your changelogs to include them. Thanks. Please be sure your board file changes are updated for the board file changes in the devel-board branch. Thanks, Kevin