All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <87lj6uj1zu.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 7953737..b576232 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -10,14 +10,14 @@ Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com> writes:
 >>>> boards, specifically 3630-based boards.
 >>>>
 >>>> First, due to the current UART idle code base, you need to enable all
->>>> OMAP UARTs 36xx.  Enabling less than all OMAP UARTs will break the
->>>> current idle code.  As we discussed, the next phase we will move the
+>>>> OMAP UARTs 36xx. ?Enabling less than all OMAP UARTs will break the
+>>>> current idle code. ?As we discussed, the next phase we will move the
 >>>> idle management from this serial.c hackery into the omap-serial driver
->>>> iteself.  Until then, you need to call omap_serial_init() on
->>>> Zoom2/Zoom3.  Patch below[1]
+>>>> iteself. ?Until then, you need to call omap_serial_init() on
+>>>> Zoom2/Zoom3. ?Patch below[1]
 >>>>
 >>>> Also, you previously had a patch that updated omap_uart_idle_init() to
->>>> handle 36xx and specifically UART4.  Without that, struct
+>>>> handle 36xx and specifically UART4. ?Without that, struct
 >>>> omap_uart_state is not setup correctly for UART4, and thus cannot be
 >>>> properly idled on 3630.
 >>>
@@ -29,18 +29,18 @@ Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com> writes:
 >>> Is this still needed if we have initialized all uarts?
 >>> This patch might not needed if we have initialized all uarts right?
 >>
->> Right.  We don't need the above patchwork patch if all UARTs are
+>> Right. ?We don't need the above patchwork patch if all UARTs are
 >> initialized.
 >>
 >> The other patch I was referring to was the one that added UART4 support
->> to omap_uart_idle_init() (added the wk_en, wk_st, padconf etc.)  I had a
+>> to omap_uart_idle_init() (added the wk_en, wk_st, padconf etc.) ?I had a
 >> pending request for you to drop the muxmode from that patch, but the
 >> rest of it was still needed.
 >>
 >>>>
->>>> Also, it's been a while since I tested this on OMAP2.  Please re-test on
->>>> OMAP2 with the whole series.  Also, please report here the other
->>>> platforms this was tested on.  The final needs to be tested on OMAP2, 3
+>>>> Also, it's been a while since I tested this on OMAP2. ?Please re-test on
+>>>> OMAP2 with the whole series. ?Also, please report here the other
+>>>> platforms this was tested on. ?The final needs to be tested on OMAP2, 3
 >>>> and 4 before merge.
 >>>
 >>> Yes Sure,
@@ -96,8 +96,3 @@ else (padconf, wk_en, wk_st) was fine.
 Please add this back to the series.
 
 Kevin
-
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index eb6e267..c0c24ef 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,15 +3,10 @@
  "ref\0AANLkTik-+RC7y=dJnDdxzrqMFnTzRV-j8s5FtmMy8ZhE@mail.gmail.com\0"
  "ref\087wrqg2xog.fsf@deeprootsystems.com\0"
  "ref\0AANLkTinqiknLaBmMj17fi31TsZ+eaSkCcgd-wbQvMpz-@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>\0"
- "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 00/11] OMAP: Serial: Add omap-serial driver with platform support\0"
+ "From\0khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman)\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 00/11] OMAP: Serial: Add omap-serial driver with platform support\0"
  "Date\0Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:05:57 -0700\0"
- "To\0Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com>\0"
- "Cc\0Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>"
-  linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
-  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
-  linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
- " Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Govindraj <govindraj.ti@gmail.com> writes:\n"
@@ -26,14 +21,14 @@
  ">>>> boards, specifically 3630-based boards.\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>> First, due to the current UART idle code base, you need to enable all\n"
- ">>>> OMAP UARTs 36xx. \302\240Enabling less than all OMAP UARTs will break the\n"
- ">>>> current idle code. \302\240As we discussed, the next phase we will move the\n"
+ ">>>> OMAP UARTs 36xx. ?Enabling less than all OMAP UARTs will break the\n"
+ ">>>> current idle code. ?As we discussed, the next phase we will move the\n"
  ">>>> idle management from this serial.c hackery into the omap-serial driver\n"
- ">>>> iteself. \302\240Until then, you need to call omap_serial_init() on\n"
- ">>>> Zoom2/Zoom3. \302\240Patch below[1]\n"
+ ">>>> iteself. ?Until then, you need to call omap_serial_init() on\n"
+ ">>>> Zoom2/Zoom3. ?Patch below[1]\n"
  ">>>>\n"
  ">>>> Also, you previously had a patch that updated omap_uart_idle_init() to\n"
- ">>>> handle 36xx and specifically UART4. \302\240Without that, struct\n"
+ ">>>> handle 36xx and specifically UART4. ?Without that, struct\n"
  ">>>> omap_uart_state is not setup correctly for UART4, and thus cannot be\n"
  ">>>> properly idled on 3630.\n"
  ">>>\n"
@@ -45,18 +40,18 @@
  ">>> Is this still needed if we have initialized all uarts?\n"
  ">>> This patch might not needed if we have initialized all uarts right?\n"
  ">>\n"
- ">> Right. \302\240We don't need the above patchwork patch if all UARTs are\n"
+ ">> Right. ?We don't need the above patchwork patch if all UARTs are\n"
  ">> initialized.\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> The other patch I was referring to was the one that added UART4 support\n"
- ">> to omap_uart_idle_init() (added the wk_en, wk_st, padconf etc.) \302\240I had a\n"
+ ">> to omap_uart_idle_init() (added the wk_en, wk_st, padconf etc.) ?I had a\n"
  ">> pending request for you to drop the muxmode from that patch, but the\n"
  ">> rest of it was still needed.\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">>>>\n"
- ">>>> Also, it's been a while since I tested this on OMAP2. \302\240Please re-test on\n"
- ">>>> OMAP2 with the whole series. \302\240Also, please report here the other\n"
- ">>>> platforms this was tested on. \302\240The final needs to be tested on OMAP2, 3\n"
+ ">>>> Also, it's been a while since I tested this on OMAP2. ?Please re-test on\n"
+ ">>>> OMAP2 with the whole series. ?Also, please report here the other\n"
+ ">>>> platforms this was tested on. ?The final needs to be tested on OMAP2, 3\n"
  ">>>> and 4 before merge.\n"
  ">>>\n"
  ">>> Yes Sure,\n"
@@ -111,11 +106,6 @@
  "\n"
  "Please add this back to the series.\n"
  "\n"
- "Kevin\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-serial\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ Kevin
 
-1849072cb0a897013a049b6b2552ac78211d9ff0d96ab1334b9eb8dcb9d39f6e
+2308d4a5c891f4d45600cdddc137a9eedbd250568672b8794c009418d0c99590

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.