From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH,RFC] Adding quotacheck functionality to e2fsck
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:09:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ljdf7bc8.fsf@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100326004738.GJ3145@quack.suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:47:38 +0100")
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> Hi Ted,
>
> On Thu 25-03-10 20:20:18, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> This is something I whipped up last night to speed up quotacheck by
>> doing the data collection in e2fsck. If e2fsck runs and does a full
>> check, it's likely that quotacheck needs to be run as well --- and it's
>> faster if e2fsck does the dirty work of fetching the information since
>> (1) it needs to paw through all of the inodes anyway, and (2) quotacheck
>> has to go through the file system and iterate over the files in an
>> non-optimal order.
>>
>> What do folks think? Obviously changes in quotacheck would be required
>> before it could take advantage of these output files, but hopefully that
>> shouldn't be hard...
>>
>> To use, either use:
>>
>> e2fsck -E usrquota_check=/tmp/quota.user,grpquota_check=/tmp/quota.group
>>
>> or you can edit /etc/e2fsck.conf and add:
>>
>> [quota]
>> directory = /var/e2fsck/quota
>>
>> I still need to write documentation, update the man pages, and do some
>> polishing, so this is still in a pretty rough state, but I'd appreciate
>> comments.
This is definitely right idea.
> This is definitely a move in the right direction. I'd be even happier
> if e2fsck would write quota file directly - then we could just make
> quota files hidden inodes, start doing quota accounting immediately
Please excuse my naive question, but is it easy enough to allocate
space during fsck? If we allow to do this then each fsck will result
in sb-changes because of new tmp quota-file creation/rename/deletion
even if sb and quota is ok.
> on mount and always do quota journaling. That would save us quite some
> trouble in kernel. The only problem with this is that we'd need to pull
> knowledge about quota formats in e2fsck...
>
> Honza
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-26 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 0:20 [PATCH,RFC] Adding quotacheck functionality to e2fsck Theodore Ts'o
2010-03-26 0:47 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 3:38 ` tytso
2010-03-26 7:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-03-26 8:18 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-03-26 10:57 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 11:15 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-03-26 16:27 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-03-29 7:35 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-29 7:50 ` dmonakhov
2010-03-26 10:54 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 13:51 ` tytso
2010-03-30 0:43 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 10:42 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 13:38 ` tytso
2010-03-30 0:55 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-30 5:26 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2010-03-30 12:42 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 8:09 ` Dmitry Monakhov [this message]
2010-03-26 11:00 ` Jan Kara
2010-03-26 13:55 ` tytso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ljdf7bc8.fsf@openvz.org \
--to=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.