From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Smith Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a multi-process IPC test Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:58:18 -0700 Message-ID: <87ljq9y7qt.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com> References: <1239299170-14827-1-git-send-email-danms@us.ibm.com> <20090409185159.GA32610@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090409185159.GA32610-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> (Serge E. Hallyn's message of "Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:51:59 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org SH> Thanks, Dan. I've got a few other simple c/r tests collected SH> which I want to automate in the next few days so one can just run SH> 'check_cr' and get a list of pass/fails. I'll also add some tests SH> which Nathan had written for IPC. Hmm, I suppose the easiest SH> thing for now will be to put a tarball on lxc.sf.net. Okay. I should probably add a little more logic to make this test validate the result (instead of requiring an eye-parse of the log) so it can be automated. -- Dan Smith IBM Linux Technology Center email: danms-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org