From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1IqULk-0006CK-T1 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:56:44 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqULj-0006BE-32 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:56:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqULh-00069a-JP for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:56:42 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqULh-00069Q-BE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:56:41 -0500 Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.23]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IqULg-00088b-NM for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:56:41 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (249-174.surfsnel.dsl.internl.net [145.99.174.249]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lA9DucPJ005291 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:56:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mgerards@xs4all.nl) From: Marco Gerards To: The development of GRUB 2 References: <1Ihl95-0ez6x60@fwd32.aul.t-online.de> <20071020233721.GA9939@thorin> <471B4EFB.6020009@t-online.de> <471B518A.8070607@nic.fi> <471B5966.4090906@t-online.de> Mail-Copies-To: mgerards@xs4all.nl Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 14:57:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <471B5966.4090906@t-online.de> (Christian Franke's message of "Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:51:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87lk97msi1.fsf@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 Subject: Re: [PATCH] grub2 for Cygwin X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:56:43 -0000 Christian Franke writes: Hi, [...] >> I see... Actually this patch has to be splitted to multiple different >> patches as not all changes seem to be related to Cygwin building. And it >> makes it much easier to get approved in smaller slices. And for each >> patch, describe in email why did you made changes related to patch. I >> see that there are some good changes that should be applied whether it >> is for cygwin build or not. But lets keep their commenting to single >> features (patches) :) >> >> > Agree. > > Busy with other projects, I decided to "release early" in one large patch. > If desired, I can send smaller patches in 2-3 weeks or so. > > Meantime, comments on the large patch are appreciated. You also sent in some small patches. Can I assume that they replace this patch? -- Marco