diff for duplicates of <87lkd29mk9.fsf@wanadoo.fr> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 834c1c2..a9e5470 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> writes: > if (!x) Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that -transformation. But some people may prefer (x = NULL) to (!x) +transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x) so I don't know. I think that transformation some 0 to NULL is less controversial. diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ac64d24..f703cfd 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "ref\022618.1185531297@redhat.com\0" "From\0Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv\0" - "Date\0Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:18:46 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:18:46 +0200\0" "To\0David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>\0" "Cc\0Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>" kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ "> \tif (!x)\n" "\n" "Yes I can. I can make another semantic patch later to do that\n" - "transformation. But some people may prefer (x = NULL) to (!x)\n" + "transformation. But some people may prefer (x == NULL) to (!x)\n" "so I don't know. I think that transformation \n" "some 0 to NULL is less controversial.\n" "\n" @@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ "> Thanks,\n" > David -e7bda34fb59c957c768c9901747157c996dafa83193463a2537943f16b1c0815 +3dc4b48a079bec22e0937addaf2311c3d89f243774c8d7d56042590e9601e517
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.