From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki
Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 09:03:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lkg61j99.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705012346.14997.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Tue, 1 May 2007 23:46:14 +0200")
* Jakub Narebski:
> The problem is with 'Size of checkout': to start working in repository
> one needs 1.4G (sources) and 98M (third party) for CVS checkout (it is
> 1.5G for sources for Subversion checkout).
The text bases for Subversion really should take another 1.4 GiB.
As a result, Subversion should be closer to 3 GiB.
> What might help here is splitting repository into current (e.g. from
> OOo 2.0) and historical part, and / or using shallow clone.
You could also split along project boundaries, but this is probably
too political.
> What I'm really concerned about is branch switch and merging branches,
> when one of the branches is an old one (e.g. unxsplash branch), which
> takes 3min (!) according to the benchmark. 13-25sec for commit is also
> bit long, but BRANCH SWITCHING which takes 3 MINUTES!?
IIRC, GIT accesses every file in the tree, not just the ones that need
updating. How many files were actually updated when you changed
branches in your experiment?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-03 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-01 21:46 Git benchmarks at OpenOffice.org wiki Jakub Narebski
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02 8:55 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 9:51 ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 10:58 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 14:28 ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 15:30 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:11 ` Julian Phillips
2007-05-02 14:37 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 15:33 ` Andy Parkins
2007-05-02 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-02 10:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 11:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-02 14:55 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-05 3:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-07 8:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-07 15:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-02 14:41 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 14:24 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 14:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-02 16:15 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:27 ` Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-02 16:37 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 16:48 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-02 23:30 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 11:51 ` [tools-dev] " Jan Holesovsky
2007-05-03 12:54 ` Alex Riesen
2007-05-03 15:14 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-05-04 0:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-03 7:03 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2007-05-03 9:33 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-03 10:16 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 10:48 ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-06 20:05 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-05-03 23:36 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lkg61j99.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de \
--to=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.