From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Czhij-0001q4-Jy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:48:57 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Czhig-0001np-0W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:48:55 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Czhif-0001kr-C3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:48:53 -0500
Received: from [195.122.192.2] (helo=janik.cz)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CzhOa-0005LY-49
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:28:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] kqemu NOT working with devfs
References: <20050211081833.140ed5bf.Jens.Arm@gmx.de>
	<200502111235.25707.martin@liga.dk> <87psz7jl57.fsf@Janik.cz>
	<200502111737.29321.martin@liga.dk>
From: Pavel@Janik.cz (Pavel =?iso-8859-2?Q?Jan=EDk?=)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:27:40 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200502111737.29321.martin@liga.dk> (Martin Moeller's message of
	"Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:37:28 +0100")
Message-ID: <87ll9uhmf7.fsf@Janik.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

   From: Martin Moeller <martin@liga.dk>
   Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:37:28 +0100

   > I doubt I'm using IPMI as such, but wouldn't there be a conflict if
   > I had two device nodes of the same major and minor number?

No. Only the first one used from { IPMI, kqemu } will work though ;-)

   > I used the '250' patch and am quite happily installing Debian Sarge =
in
   > a KQemu Qemu at the moment...

Great!
--=20
Pavel Jan=EDk

I don't deal with that (in fact, I *couldn't*, because
of the asinine BK license.)
                  -- H. Peter Anvin about BK snapshots