From: Alexander Hoogerhuis <alexh@ihatent.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads
Date: 02 Jun 2003 16:03:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87llwkpoex.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200306012021.41147.oliver@neukum.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org> writes:
> > > Probably the block layer as it waits for free io slots.
> > > But that doesn't tell us why the requests are not executed.
> > > Where is SCSI timeout kicking in?
> >
> > I'm not seeing any scsi timeouts in the logs.
>
> So it seems that the driver doesn't fail utterly, but crawls along.
> Storage's debugging output should clarify the situation.
>
I had a private reply form a guy that had three of these running
reliably on 2.4.21-pre6, and he noted he'd never done cd->disk
transfers, but across the net. So I did the same.
Results are that it survived a lot longer, I managed to get about
700Mb across at about 8Mb/s (line speed 100mbit half duplex) before it
fell over with this:
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk status Sig 0x53425355 T 0xc42 R 0 Stat 0x0
usb-storage: scsi cmd done, result=0x0
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
usb-storage: queuecommand() called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command WRITE_10 (10 bytes)
usb-storage: 2a 00 18 f0 34 47 00 04 00 00
usb-storage: Bulk command S 0x43425355 T 0xc43 Trg 0 LUN 0 L 524288 F 0 CL 10
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_sglist: xfer 524288 bytes, 128 entries
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 524288/524288
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk data transfer result 0x0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: usb_storage_command_abort called
usb-storage: usb_stor_stop_transport called
usb-storage: -- cancelling URB
usb-storage: Status code -104; transferred 0/13
usb-storage: -- transfer cancelled
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 3
usb-storage: -- command was aborted
usb-storage: Bulk reset requested
usb-storage: Soft reset: clearing bulk-in endpoint halt
usb-storage: Soft reset: clearing bulk-out endpoint halt
usb-storage: Soft reset done
usb-storage: scsi command aborted
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
usb-storage: queuecommand() called
usb-storage: *** thread awakened.
usb-storage: Command TEST_UNIT_READY (6 bytes)
usb-storage: 00 00 00 00 00 00
usb-storage: Bulk command S 0x43425355 T 0xc43 Trg 0 LUN 0 L 0 F 0 CL 6
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 31 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 31/31
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk command transfer result=0
usb-storage: Attempting to get CSW...
usb-storage: usb_stor_bulk_transfer_buf: xfer 13 bytes
usb-storage: Status code 0; transferred 13/13
usb-storage: -- transfer complete
usb-storage: Bulk status result = 0
usb-storage: Bulk status Sig 0x53425355 T 0xc43 R 0 Stat 0x0
usb-storage: scsi cmd done, result=0x0
usb-storage: *** thread sleeping.
Load only got up to about 3-4 before it fell over.
Apart from that, it seems the speed at which it falls over is depening
on two factors: with/without debugging and speed at which data arrives
for the drive.
Using a ssh-session that limited it to 3Mb/sec and it ran fine for a
long time with interrupts showing at about 5000 a second for the
usb-controller (vs. 1000 for the timer). With the example above that
made it fall over it ran at close to 10k interrupts/sec.
If it makes a difference, transferring from a local CD-ROM to the
drive across USB 2.0 also uses ide-scsi. The 2.4 example I had falling
over used no ide-scsi.
mvh,
A
- --
Alexander Hoogerhuis | alexh@ihatent.com
CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE | +47 908 21 485
"You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it." --Scott McNealy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+21kjCQ1pa+gRoggRAiV4AJ9OAqrgeSP5WzwkonApbZtNPDOd1QCfTz68
81LU78RHkdpIlLNPD6Bgr6g=
=4Lmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-02 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-01 14:31 USB 2.0 with 250Gb disk and insane loads David Brownell
2003-06-01 14:53 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-01 15:17 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-01 18:21 ` Oliver Neukum
2003-06-02 6:51 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-02 14:03 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis [this message]
2003-06-02 17:13 ` David Brownell
2003-06-02 17:17 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-03 11:49 ` Terje Malmedal
2003-06-01 14:57 ` Alexander Hoogerhuis
2003-06-13 20:19 ` David Brownell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-01 13:47 Alexander Hoogerhuis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87llwkpoex.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com \
--to=alexh@ihatent.com \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.