From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Farhad Alemi <farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: irq: Free the irqdomain we create
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 21:00:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mrtw7sf3.ffs@fw13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901-regmap-irq-deallocate-domain-v1-1-4bfed4aff559@kernel.org>
On Tue, Sep 01 2026 at 22:55, Mark Brown wrote:
> When domain support was added to regmap-irq it was not possible to
> remove domains, this was added later by 8ee99ada293b (irqdomain: Support
> removal of IRQ domains.). We did update the main removal path to free
> the domain but forgot the error unwinding case during creation that is
> now in regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode() after some code motion, meaning that
> errors during instantiation result in an unused irqchip being left
> hanging around. Add the missing irq_remove_domain() call where the
> comment says it should be.
>
> Reported-by: Farhad Alemi <farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu>
> Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
> index 99b55b1053ee..715eb9e7aa2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap-irq.c
> @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ int regmap_add_irq_chip_fwnode(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return 0;
>
> err_domain:
> - /* Should really dispose of the domain but... */
> + irq_domain_remove(d->domain);
That won't work.
The case which is affected is the one which allocates interrupts
upfront via alloc_irq_descs().
In that case the domain creation will associate allocated interrupts
because info.virq_base is > 0.
This wont trigger the WARN_ON() in irq_domain_remove() because it's a
fixed sized linear domain, but irq_domain_remove() will leak the
interrupt descriptors which still have a reference (pointer) to the irq
chip and the domain. So the same UAF is still there :)
What you need to do before removing the domain is
if (irq_base > 0)
irq_domain_free_irqs(irq_base, chip->num_irqs);
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-01 21:55 [PATCH] regmap: irq: Free the irqdomain we create Mark Brown
2026-09-01 22:49 ` Mark Brown
2026-09-04 19:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-09-04 19:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-09-04 19:21 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mrtw7sf3.ffs@fw13 \
--to=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=farhad.alemi@berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.