From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Maulik Shah <quic_mkshah@quicinc.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: smp: Implement cpus_has_pending_ipi()
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:01:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ms5pzkxa.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251003150251.520624-3-ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
On Fri, Oct 03 2025 at 17:02, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Note, the implementation is intentionally lightweight and doesn't use
> any
By some definition of lightweight.
> static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr)
> {
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_cpu(cpu, target)
> + per_cpu(pending_ipi, cpu) = true;
Iterating over a full cpumask on a big system is not necessarily
considered lightweight. And that comes on top of the loop in
smp_call_function_many_cond() plus the potential loop in
arm64_send_ipi()...
None of this is actually needed. If you want a lightweight racy check
whether there is an IPI en route to a set of CPUs then you can simply do
that in kernel/smp.c:
bool smp_pending_ipis_crystalball(mask)
{
for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
if (!llist_empty(per_cpu_ptr(&call_single_queue, cpu)))
return true;
}
return false;
}
No?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-03 15:02 [PATCH 0/3] pmdomain: Improve idlestate selection for CPUs Ulf Hansson
2025-10-03 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] smp: Introduce a weak helper function to check for pending IPIs Ulf Hansson
2025-10-03 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: smp: Implement cpus_has_pending_ipi() Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 10:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-06 12:22 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 14:41 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-10-10 8:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 15:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-10-10 8:30 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-10 9:48 ` Marc Zyngier
2025-10-10 9:55 ` Mark Rutland
2025-10-17 14:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-10-20 13:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-03 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] pmdomain: Extend the genpd governor for CPUs to account for IPIs Ulf Hansson
2025-10-06 15:36 ` [PATCH 0/3] pmdomain: Improve idlestate selection for CPUs Sudeep Holla
2025-10-10 7:52 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ms5pzkxa.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=quic_mkshah@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.