From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 15:54:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msa2r018.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1965cae22a0.12ab5a70c833868.7155412488566097801@linux.beauty>
On Tue, Apr 22 2025 at 16:47, Li Chen wrote:
> Currently, the SMT domain is added into sched_domain_topology
> by default if CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is enabled.
>
> If cpu_attach_domain finds that the CPU SMT domain’s cpumask_weight
> is just 1, it will destroy_sched_domain it.
If cpu_attach_domain() ..., it will destroy it.
> On a large machine, such as one with 512 cores, this results in
> 512 redundant domain attach/destroy operations.
>
> We can avoid these unnecessary operations by simply checking
s/We can avoid/Avoid/
> cpu_smt_num_threads and not inserting SMT domain into x86_topology if SMT
the SMT domain
> is not enabled.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> - x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> - cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
> - };
> + if (cpu_smt_num_threads > 1) {
> + x86_topology[i++] = (struct sched_domain_topology_level){
> + cpu_smt_mask, cpu_smt_flags, SD_INIT_NAME(SMT)
> + };
> + }
Looks about right, though I really detest this coding style. I'm not
blaming you, as you just followed the already existing bad taste...
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-20 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-22 8:47 [PATCH RESEND] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
2025-06-20 2:27 ` Li Chen
2025-06-20 13:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-06-20 15:47 ` [PATCH] x86/smpboot: Decrapify build_sched_topology() Thomas Gleixner
2025-06-24 9:00 ` [PATCH RESEND] x86/smpboot: avoid SMT domain attach/destroy if SMT is not enabled Li Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msa2r018.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.