From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12B9F22F39B for ; Wed, 7 May 2025 09:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746608697; cv=none; b=ZoSIRNpDe8h5Vv76LO6LMOIQnzAekEAJabR6iOsntS8ibhPwXfmkkPreYuflhFerN/cDWZm5e689at6pSR8AQ/QzrOUTK7ENB4d+yc0Au4d6CY5dwr+W0FlyF1ktVmslRe/3M0lKJ6+jETUypNks/X45sfVIhUQkxcdOwbfXusI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746608697; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JWWERBufmK6LRMNVXCv1mQKo+iN3/RA6XAy7ezw5O5w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pHDanGkFqYnMEVhVCQa8ivcDboERoGKEDUq++gQwWvyegGv01lukTArS8B6IP0fghvUsZKYFdVNjmHyvucgaeI1r9YG5C+bPm2KC4v3FM01CBwjKPkHFLg4SCNZfc8Luh7XnlGVEmMxHRTOF3XMs2HPwRo5+xxmj3OL0TOVjEC4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=U03Rs5nl; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=fV5IOBZN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="U03Rs5nl"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="fV5IOBZN" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1746608693; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JWWERBufmK6LRMNVXCv1mQKo+iN3/RA6XAy7ezw5O5w=; b=U03Rs5nlRhSWt78kSkk3WReqfV31DBMizYQ8sv9+sECVjH241msgdR9C6ckdFa3PleiEt/ RmiuIp5yvMbSwniJ4aLkOmks2wV8ZgfaCBF7gdGf1W4q+VwecwTEk9a2Yfq+nB/esO3ms9 mGAiP0Ssuht6bUYo6Fx1e1Lu9aRU0i7tfwQo0PHGj3nmR+xoGItx1OKxWGJjUJ65d359A6 X1PSvRbdpy4EeqQxTJPLGAHN8R3GltgbLXmonrD9Qu4CLuT5mrq9t/xxMUZfEJNxjFjmPu W4APWsJpJaCTWRD1HeZPkQVA6twXEUYvlzKgGiielA4MAVwiPy3IEOoqXyApcQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1746608693; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=JWWERBufmK6LRMNVXCv1mQKo+iN3/RA6XAy7ezw5O5w=; b=fV5IOBZNCQtZSZLNlqx3sKGBuPCrs0HJMGILpQ9i2TCCO/MQTD1aJIIHgkO5c51Kp9fUiZ gp0snI9fpMGDHsBg== To: Huacai Chen , Charlie Jenkins Cc: WANG Xuerui , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH core/entry] LoongArch: Fix include order In-Reply-To: References: <20250507-loongarch_include_order-v1-1-e8aada6a3da8@rivosinc.com> Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 11:04:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87msbon64r.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: loongarch@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 07 2025 at 15:26, Huacai Chen wrote: > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 3:11=E2=80=AFPM Charlie Jenkins wrote: >> >> Reorder some introduced include headers to keep alphabetical order. >> >> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins >> Fixes: 7ace1602abf2 ("LoongArch: entry: Migrate ret_from_fork() to C") >> --- >> This is a very minor fix to a patch previously applied to the core/entry >> tip. > If possible, I prefer it to be squashed to the original patch. The branch is immutable. It's fine to have it on top.