From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: <tiwai@suse.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
<linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/cs_dsp_ctl: Actually remove ALSA controls
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 17:17:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msp79b7o.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503144920.61075-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Fri, 03 May 2024 16:49:20 +0200,
Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> hda_cs_dsp_control_remove() must remove the ALSA control when
> deleting all the infrastructure for handling the control.
>
> Without this it is possible for ALSA controls to be left in
> the Soundcard after the amp driver module has been unloaded.
> So the get/set callbacks point to code that no longer exists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Fixes: 3233b978af23 ("ALSA: hda: hda_cs_dsp_ctl: Add Library to support CS_DSP ALSA controls")
> ---
> Note: it would be better to use the control private_free to do the
> cleanup, and that is my plan long-term. But that is a larger change
> to the code.
>
> I like to keep bugfix patches as simple as possible so they are
> low-risk and easy to cherry-pick into older kernels. So this patch
> fixes the bug. Sometime I will send a patch for future kernel
> versions that reworks the cleanup to use private_free.
I also like to keep as simple as possible :)
One slight concern is whether cs_dsp kctls can be deleted at the
snd_card removal (disconnect) before this function gets called.
That is, snd_card_free() of the main card may delete all associated
kctls, and may this function be called afterwards?
If yes, this change would lead to a UAF.
The structure is so complex and I can't follow immediately,
unfortunately...
thanks,
Takashi
> ---
> sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c
> index 463ca06036bf..a42653d3473d 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ void hda_cs_dsp_control_remove(struct cs_dsp_coeff_ctl *cs_ctl)
> {
> struct hda_cs_dsp_coeff_ctl *ctl = cs_ctl->priv;
>
> + /* Only public firmware controls will have an associated kcontrol */
> + if (ctl && ctl->kctl)
> + snd_ctl_remove(ctl->card, ctl->kctl);
> +
> kfree(ctl);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(hda_cs_dsp_control_remove, SND_HDA_CS_DSP_CONTROLS);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 14:49 [PATCH] ALSA: hda/cs_dsp_ctl: Actually remove ALSA controls Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-03 15:17 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2024-05-03 15:31 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-03 16:16 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msp79b7o.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.