From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C518C77B7A for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 08:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pyqS5-0006VR-Tm; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:54:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pyqRw-0006Sb-3L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:54:28 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pyqRt-00046F-Uv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:54:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1684227264; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WQxqQJgs7k89b7lIN0r5f+BR1q+truniUYHQdOLJ/Ug=; b=bBy+mzMv/G4SpnUxWd9SSJ9F/jb75qvGpDpbDuLB4rghImSLHh4z3irb9QUXwhcQ7PW6ku 3sEYcEjdw5VlgyyU4nP39pBbPZTLrMNvIQhaP30UBlG22cYVtRbD0JWQz5WrCekmlTlFY8 61kp9BKPavya7xCj6GOYAIl0BRMFHwg= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-124-ttmx1RRXOy-E1T5qGuUreQ-1; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:54:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ttmx1RRXOy-E1T5qGuUreQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3046587DC01; Tue, 16 May 2023 08:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blackfin.pond.sub.org (unknown [10.39.192.91]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0036840C2063; Tue, 16 May 2023 08:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by blackfin.pond.sub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC32121E681C; Tue, 16 May 2023 10:54:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Markus Armbruster To: "T.J. Alumbaugh" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , David Hildenbrand , Yuanchu Xie , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , Eric Blake , Yu Zhao Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] virtio-balloon: Add Working Set Reporting feature References: <20230510143856.964541-1-talumbau@google.com> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:54:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20230510143856.964541-1-talumbau@google.com> (T. J. Alumbaugh's message of "Wed, 10 May 2023 14:38:55 +0000") Message-ID: <87mt24u05h.fsf@pond.sub.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=armbru@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org I can look at how the QAPI interface is done, but before I do that, I'd like to see a review of feature as a whole by subject matter experts. Any takers?